The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients

被引:8
|
作者
Matharu, G. S. [1 ]
Janardhan, S. [1 ]
Brash, L. [1 ]
Pynsent, P. B. [1 ]
Dunlop, D. J. [1 ]
James, S. L. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Bristol Rd S, Birmingham B31 2AP, W Midlands, England
关键词
Adverse reaction to metal debris; follow-up; hip arthroplasty; metal-on-metal; ultrasound; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; OXFORD HIP; PSEUDOTUMORS; REPLACEMENTS; RESURFACINGS; REVISION; FAILURE; BEARINGS; MRI;
D O I
10.1308/rcsann.2016.0052
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION We assessed changes in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) after repeat ultrasound examination. METHODS This retrospective, single-centre cohort study involved all patients undergoing two ultrasound examinations of the same MoMHA. Between 2010 and 2014, 96 ultrasound examinations were performed in 48 MoMHAs (mean time between scans = 1.1 years). A radiologist assigned each scan to one of four grades and measured volumes of any solid/cystic masses. Changes in grade and lesion volume between scans were analysed. RESULTS Change in grade between scans was significant (p=0.012); 27% (n=13) of MoMHAs increased in grade, 67% (n=32) had no grade change, and 6% (n=3) decreased in grade. The mean increase in lesion volume was 24.2cm(3) by the second scan, and was significant (p=0.023). Evidence of progression in findings was observed in 54% (26/48) of MoMHAs. Of patients with normal scans initially, 44% (8/18) developed abnormalities. No factors (including blood metal ion concentrations and cup position) were associated significantly with progression of ultrasound findings. CONCLUSIONS Repeat ultrasound in MoMHA patients demonstrated that findings frequently progress in the short-term. Therefore, regular surveillance of MoMHA patients is important, with ultrasound representing an effective investigation for identifying the development and progression of lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MRI Findings in Patients After Small-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years
    Reiner, Tobias
    Do, Thuy D.
    Klotz, Matthias C.
    Hertzsch, Fabian
    Seelmann, Kirsten
    Gaida, Matthias M.
    Weber, Marc-Andre
    Gotterbarm, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (18): : 1540 - 1546
  • [22] Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: Minimum of two years follow-up
    Lilikakis, AK
    Vowler, SL
    Villar, RN
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (02) : 215 - +
  • [23] The value of serial metal ion levels in following up patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty
    McHugh, Gavin
    Merchant, Rajiv
    Kelly, Gabrielle E.
    Bergin, Karen M.
    McCoy, Gerald F.
    Wozniak, Andrew P.
    Quinlan, John F.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [24] Comparative Mid-term Follow-up Study of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Metal-on-metal and Metal-on-polyethylene Bearings
    Li, Zhi
    Chen, Zhe-feng
    Liu, Jiu-xiang
    Liu, Feng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (04) : 312 - 320
  • [25] A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients—a minimum of five year follow-up
    Ran Tao
    Fan Liu
    Ya-ke Liu
    Yue Lu
    Hua Xu
    Yi Cao
    Zhen-yu Zhou
    Wei Wang
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2323 - 2327
  • [26] Limited need for screening of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients beyond 10 years of follow-up
    van der Weegen, Walter
    Hoekstra, Henk
    Brakel, Koen
    Sijbesma, Thea
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (01) : 106 - 112
  • [27] A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of fiveyear follow-up
    Tao, Ran
    Liu, Fan
    Liu, Ya-ke
    Lu, Yue
    Xu, Hua
    Cao, Yi
    Zhou, Zhen-yu
    Wang, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (10) : 2323 - 2327
  • [28] Is Ultrasound As Useful As Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Longitudinal Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
    Kwon, Young-Min
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Tsai, Tsung-Yuan
    Li, Guoan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (08): : 1821 - 1827
  • [29] Scoring the Current Risk Stratification Guidelines in Follow-up Evaluation of Patients After Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty A Proposal for a Metal-on-Metal Risk Score Supporting Clinical Decision-Making
    Hussey, Daniel K.
    Madanat, Rami
    Donahue, Gabrielle S.
    Rolfson, Ola
    Bragdon, Charles R.
    Muratoglu, Orhun K.
    Malchau, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (22): : 1905 - 1912
  • [30] Metal-on-metal total hip joint replacement: a minimum follow-up of five years
    Sharma, S.
    Vassan, U.
    Bhamra, M. S.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 17 (02) : 70 - 77