Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

被引:18
|
作者
Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang [1 ]
Wong, Carlos King Ho [2 ]
Cheung, Jason Pui Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Family Med & Primary Care, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PREVALENCE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2018.04.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Low back pain is a common health problem encountered by various populations among different countries. This prospective study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) into Traditional Chinese and to assess its validity, reliability and sensitivity in Chinese patients experiencing low back pain. Methods: Double forward and single back translation of the JOABPEQ was performed with cross-cultural adaptation. By convenience sampling, the final version of the translated JOABPEQ was administered to Chinese patients attending a specialty outpatient clinic with a history of back pain, followed by the traditional Chinese versions of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2). Construct validity of the domains were assessed using Spearman's correlation test. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha (alpha). Sensitivity of the adapted JOABPEQ was determined by known group comparisons. Results: A total of 100 patients were recruited. The translated JOABPEQ demonstrated excellent overall internal consistency (alpha: 0.912); and good internal consistency for the domains of Lumbar Function, Walking Ability, Social Life Function and Mental Health (alpha: 0.811, 0.808, 0.788, and 0.827 respectively). Scores of all domains of the translated JOABPEQ had significant correlations (p < 0.01) with ODI at all domains, as well as with almost all domains of SF-12v2 (p < 0.01-0.05). The translated JOABPEQ was sensitive in detecting differences in patients with/without a history of previous spine surgery, and also between patients with acute/acute on chronic versus chronic pain in specific domains. Conclusions: The Traditional Chinese version of JOABPEQ has satisfactory psychometric properties in general, including adequate clinical and construct validity, and internal consistency in assessing Southern-Chinese patients with low back pain. It is demonstrated as a sensitive outcome measure. The translated JOABPEQ is verified for its use in the local clinical setting for patient assessment and future research. (C) 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 757
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the prenatal body image questionnaire
    Wang, Qiaosong
    Lin, Jingjing
    Zheng, Qirong
    Kang, Liping
    Zhang, Xueling
    Zhang, Kun
    Lin, Rong
    Lin, Rongjin
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [32] Validation and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the prenatal body image questionnaire
    Qiaosong Wang
    Jingjing Lin
    Qirong Zheng
    Liping Kang
    Xueling Zhang
    Kun Zhang
    Rong Lin
    Rongjin Lin
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24
  • [33] Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Sato, Masato
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Mochida, Joji
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (03) : 503 - 512
  • [34] Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Akihiko Hiyama
    Masahiko Watanabe
    Hiroyuki Katoh
    Masato Sato
    Daisuke Sakai
    Joji Mochida
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 503 - 512
  • [35] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of new fear of the coronavirus questionnaire
    Zha, PeiJia
    Zhang, Crystal
    Qureshi, Rubab
    Cai, GuiGui
    Huang, LiHong
    Liu, Yang
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (09) : E37282
  • [36] Validity of a tablet computer version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip disease evaluation questionnaire: a pilot study
    Takegami, Yasuhiko
    Seki, Taisuke
    Kaneuji, Ayumi
    Nakao, Akinobu
    Hasegawa, Yukiharu
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 78 (03): : 237 - 244
  • [37] Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Version of the STarT Back Tool in Patients with Low Back Pain
    Matsudaira, Ko
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Kikuchi, Norimasa
    Haga, Yuri
    Sawada, Takayuki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [38] The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?
    Alfayez, Saud Mohammed
    Bin Dous, Abdullah Nasser
    Altowim, Abdullah Abdulaziz
    Alrabiei, Qais Abdulmohsin
    Alsubaie, Bandar Obaid
    Awwad, Waleed Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (04) : 618 - 621
  • [39] Psychometric Validation of the Traditional Chinese Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Mak, Hugo W. F.
    Lee, Elaine
    Wong, Jane C. Y.
    Li, Philip H.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2024,
  • [40] Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with subacute and chronic low back pain
    Errebo, Mette
    Oxfeldt, Martin
    Tegner, Heidi
    Christensen, Jan
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 24 (01)