Estimating the implied risk premium of US-listed shipping firms

被引:8
|
作者
Makrominas, Michalis [1 ]
机构
[1] Frederick Univ, Dept Maritime Studies, 7 Y Frederickou Str, CY-1036 Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
Water transportation; shipping return; implied cost of capital; CAPM; risk; policy; EXPECTED STOCK RETURNS; ASSET PRICING TESTS; CROSS-SECTION; CASH FLOW; EQUITY VALUATION; LIQUIDITY RISK; COMMON-STOCKS; MARKET VALUE; COST; EQUILIBRIUM;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2018.1450527
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
While the water transportation industry is perceived as risk-laden, expected return estimates for shipping firms, based on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), are found to be 'remarkably low.' We apply the implied cost of capital (ICC), defined as the constant discount rate that equates share prices and future cash flows, as an alternative means of shipping expected returns and use these estimates instead, as well as in conjunction with the CAPM to provide fresh evidence on the risk and return characteristics of the shipping industry. An aggregate measure of ICC reveals that the median risk premium of shipping firms between 1983 and 2013 is in the range of 0.94% to 0.08%. The expected return of shipping firms tracks a long-term moving average of the S&P 500 index; nevertheless, shipping returns are below the index return at similar, and at times lower, levels with the 10-year treasury yield. The expected equity premium of the shipping industry implied in the cross-section of ICC estimates and CAPM betas ranges between 1.4% and 0.2%. The persistence of a 'shipping return paradox' against a variant of expected return methodologies may indicate the pricing of higher moments in the return distribution of shipping firms beyond the mean-variance framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1041
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Leveraging Chinese Stock Markets: Tracking the Performance and Return Deviation of US-listed Chinese LETFs
    Tang, Hongfei
    Xu, Xiaoqing Eleanor
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2013, 42 (06) : 845 - 879
  • [42] Do Chinese Firms Listed in US Perform Better?
    Xiao, Chengmin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 308 - 311
  • [43] Why are foreign firms listed in the US worth more?
    Doidge, C
    Karolyi, GA
    Stulz, RM
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 71 (02) : 205 - 238
  • [44] Disaggregated earnings and stock prices: Evidence from international listed shipping firms
    Apergis N.
    Sorros J.
    International Advances in Economic Research, 2010, 16 (3) : 269 - 281
  • [45] Cross-border listings and price discovery: Evidence from US-listed Canadian stocks
    Eun, CS
    Sabherwal, S
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (02): : 549 - 575
  • [46] Implied Risk Assessment Model of Earnings in Chinese Listed Companies
    Zhou Wei-Wang
    2010 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (ICIFE), 2010, : 813 - 817
  • [47] On Litigation Risk and Disclosure Complexity: Evidence from Canadian Firms Cross-Listed in the US
    Gillan, Stuart L.
    Panasian, Christine A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2014, 49 (04): : 426 - 454
  • [48] Firm-level political risk and corporate innovation: evidence from US listed firms
    Ahmed, Huson Ali
    Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul
    Khan, Arifur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 19 (03) : 519 - 538
  • [49] Decoding financial performance of US-listed entities: A sectoral exploration of input efficiency amid stochastic volatility
    Andrews, Antony
    Kumar, Nikeel Nishkar
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 64
  • [50] Unveiling the Evolution of Enterprise Digital Innovation Strategies: Insights From US-Listed Companies' Annual Reports
    Bai, Shizhen
    Tan, Yongbo
    Han, Chunjia
    Yang, Mu
    Gupta, Brij B.
    Arya, Varsha
    Kumar, Neeraj
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 11 (06) : 8243 - 8256