Quantification of In Vivo Target Engagement Using Microfluidic Activity-Based Protein Profiling

被引:5
|
作者
Reardon, Holly T. [1 ]
Herbst, Rachel A. [1 ]
Henry, Cassandra L. [1 ]
Herbst, Dylan M. [1 ]
Ngo, Nhi [1 ]
Cisar, Justin S. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Olivia D. [1 ]
Niphakis, Micah J. [1 ]
O'Neill, Gary P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Abide Therapeut, 10835 Rd Cure Ste 250, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Janssen Res & Dev, Spring House, PA USA
来源
SLAS TECHNOLOGY | 2019年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
ABPP; LabChip; protein chip; monoacylglycerol lipase; MGLL; DISCOVERY;
D O I
10.1177/2472630319852303
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate measurement of drug-target interactions in vivo is critical for both preclinical development and translation to clinical studies, yet many assays rely on indirect measures such as biomarkers associated with target activity. Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is a direct method of quantifying enzyme activity using active site-targeted small-molecule covalent probes that selectively label active but not inhibitor-bound enzymes. Probe-labeled enzymes in complex proteomes are separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quantified by fluorescence imaging. To accelerate workflows and avoid imaging artifacts that make conventional gels challenging to quantify, we adapted protocols for a commercial LabChip GXII microfluidic instrument to permit electrophoretic separation of probe-labeled proteins in tissue lysates and plasma, and quantification of fluorescence (probe/protein labeling ratio of 1:1). Electrophoretic separation on chips occurred in 40 s per sample, and instrument software automatically identified and quantified peaks, resulting in an overall time savings of 3-5 h per 96-well sample plate. Calculated percent inhibition was not significantly different between the two formats. Chip performance was consistent between chips and sample replicates. Conventional gel imaging was more sensitive but required five times higher sample volume than microfluidic chips. Microfluidic chips produced results comparable to those of gels but with much lower sample consumption, facilitating assay miniaturization for scarce biological samples. The time savings afforded by microfluidic electrophoresis and automatic quantification has allowed us to incorporate microfluidic ABPP early in the drug discovery workflow, enabling routine assessments of tissue distribution and engagement of targets and off-targets in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 498
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Activity-based protein profiling in vivo using click chemistry.
    Speers, AE
    Cravatt, BF
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U185 - U185
  • [2] Activity-Based Protein Profiling for Natural Product Target Discovery
    Krysiak, Joanna
    Breinbauer, Rolf
    ACTIVITY-BASED PROTEIN PROFILING, 2012, 324 : 43 - 84
  • [3] Activity-based Protein Profiling
    Wang Chu
    Chen Nan
    ACTA CHIMICA SINICA, 2015, 73 (07) : 657 - 668
  • [4] Activity-Based Protein Profiling Preface
    Sieber, Stephan
    Nodwell, Matthew
    ACTIVITY-BASED PROTEIN PROFILING, 2012, 324 : IX - X
  • [5] Activity-based protein profiling of microbes
    Sadler, Natalie C.
    Wright, Aaron T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 139 - 144
  • [6] Activity-Based Protein Profiling Preface
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    Hsu, Ku-Lung
    Weerapana, Eranthie
    ACTIVITY-BASED PROTEIN PROFILING, 2019, 420 : V - VII
  • [7] Confirming Target Engagement for Reversible Inhibitors in Vivo by Kinetically Tuned Activity-Based Probes
    Adibekian, Alexander
    Martin, Brent R.
    Chang, Jae Won
    Hsu, Ku-Lung
    Tsuboi, Katsunori
    Bachovchin, Daniel A.
    Speers, Anna E.
    Brown, Steven J.
    Spicer, Timothy
    Fernandez-Vega, Virneliz
    Ferguson, Jill
    Hodder, Peter S.
    Rosen, Hugh
    Cravatt, Benjamin F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 134 (25) : 10345 - 10348
  • [8] Target identification of covalently binding drugs by activity-based protein profiling (ABPP)
    Pichler, Christian M.
    Krysiak, Joanna
    Breinbauer, Rolf
    BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 24 (15) : 3291 - 3303
  • [9] Relative quantification of proteasome activity by activity-based protein profiling and LC-MS/MS
    Li, Nan
    Kuo, Chi-Lin
    Paniagua, Guillem
    van den Elst, Hans
    Verdoes, Martijn
    Willems, Lianne I.
    van der Linden, Wouter A.
    Ruben, Mark
    van Genderen, Eric
    Gubbens, Jacob
    van Wezel, Gilles P.
    Overkleeft, Herman S.
    Florea, Bogdan I.
    NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2013, 8 (06) : 1155 - 1168
  • [10] Relative quantification of proteasome activity by activity-based protein profiling and LC-MS/MS
    Nan Li
    Chi-Lin Kuo
    Guillem Paniagua
    Hans van den Elst
    Martijn Verdoes
    Lianne I Willems
    Wouter A van der Linden
    Mark Ruben
    Eric van Genderen
    Jacob Gubbens
    Gilles P van Wezel
    Herman S Overkleeft
    Bogdan I Florea
    Nature Protocols, 2013, 8 : 1155 - 1168