Translation Quality and Error Recognition in Professional Neural Machine Translation Post-Editing

被引:21
|
作者
Vardaro, Jennifer [1 ]
Schaeffer, Moritz [1 ]
Hansen-Schirra, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, English Linguist & Translat Studies, D-76726 Mainz, Germany
来源
INFORMATICS-BASEL | 2019年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
neural machine translation; post-editing; revision; error annotations; Hjerson; MQM; European Commission (DGT); eye-tracking; key-logging; post-editing effort; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.3390/informatics6030041
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study aims to analyse how translation experts from the German department of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Translation (DGT) identify and correct different error categories in neural machine translated texts (NMT) and their post-edited versions (NMTPE). The term translation expert encompasses translator, post-editor as well as revisor. Even though we focus on neural machine-translated segments, translator and post-editor are used synonymously because of the combined workflow using CAT-Tools as well as machine translation. Only the distinction between post-editor, which refers to a DGT translation expert correcting the neural machine translation output, and revisor, which refers to a DGT translation expert correcting the post-edited version of the neural machine translation output, is important and made clear whenever relevant. Using an automatic error annotation tool and the more fine-grained manual error annotation framework to identify characteristic error categories in the DGT texts, a corpus analysis revealed that quality assurance measures by post-editors and revisors of the DGT are most often necessary for lexical errors. More specifically, the corpus analysis showed that, if post-editors correct mistranslations, terminology or stylistic errors in an NMT sentence, revisors are likely to correct the same error type in the same post-edited sentence, suggesting that the DGT experts were being primed by the NMT output. Subsequently, we designed a controlled eye-tracking and key-logging experiment to compare participants' eye movements for test sentences containing the three identified error categories (mistranslations, terminology or stylistic errors) and for control sentences without errors. We examined the three error types' effect on early (first fixation durations, first pass durations) and late eye movement measures (e.g., total reading time and regression path durations). Linear mixed-effects regression models predict what kind of behaviour of the DGT experts is associated with the correction of different error types during the post-editing process.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Machine Translation Post-Editing Annotation System (MTPEAS) A standardized and user-friendly taxonomy for student post-editing quality assessment
    Bodart, Romane
    Piette, Justine
    Lefer, Marie-Aude
    TRANSLATION SPACES, 2024,
  • [42] How does the post-editing of neural machine translation compare with from-scratch translation? A product and process study
    Jia, Yanfang
    Carl, Michael
    Wang, Xiangling
    JOURNAL OF SPECIALISED TRANSLATION, 2019, (31): : 60 - 86
  • [43] Cognitive effort in human translation and machine translation post-editing processes A holistic and phased view
    Wang, Yu
    Jalalian Daghigh, Ali
    FORUM-REVUE INTERNATIONALE D INTERPRETATION ET DE TRADUCTION-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERPRETATION AND TRANSLATION, 2023, 21 (01): : 139 - 162
  • [44] Patterns of Terminological Variation in Post-editing and of Cognate Use in Machine Translation in Contrast to Human Translation
    Culo, Oliver
    Nitzke, Jean
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2016, 4 (02): : 106 - 114
  • [45] Human factors in machine translation and post-editing among institutional translators
    Cadwell, Patrick
    Castilho, Sheila
    O'Brien, Sharon
    Mitchell, Linda
    TRANSLATION SPACES, 2016, 5 (02) : 222 - 243
  • [46] Machine translation: key concepts, evaluation processes and post-editing techniques
    Ferragud Ferragud, Maria
    TRANS-REVISTA DE TRADUCTOLOGIA, 2022, (26): : 394 - 397
  • [47] Performance Improvement of Machine Translation System using LID and Post-editing
    Mrinalini, K.
    Sangavi, G.
    Vijayalakshmi, P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON), 2016, : 2134 - 2137
  • [48] Machine Translation and Post-editing in AVT: A Pilot Study on a Rising Practice
    Arnaiz-Uzquiza, Veronica
    Gonzalez, Paula Igareda
    TRANS-REVISTA DE TRADUCTOLOGIA, 2023, (27): : 197 - 214
  • [49] Second language learners' post-editing strategies for machine translation errors
    Shin, Dongkawang
    Chon, Yuah V.
    LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 27 (01):
  • [50] Using the TED Talks to Evaluate Spoken Post-editing of Machine Translation
    Liyanapathirana, Jeevanthi
    Popescu-Belis, Andrei
    LREC 2016 - TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2016, : 2232 - 2239