Comparison of Different Machine and Deep Learning Techniques to Predict Air Quality Index: A Case of Kocaeli Province

被引:1
|
作者
Bilen, Zeynep [1 ]
Bozkurt, Ferhat [1 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Bilgisayar Muhendisligi Bolumu, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
machine learning; deep learning; classification; prediction; air pollution; air quality index;
D O I
10.1109/SIU53274.2021.9477936
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Air pollution is increasing day by day with the increase of urbanization and industrialization. Increased air pollution adversely affects our health. Air quality index is used to determine to what extent it affects our health. The air quality index is used to classify the quality of the air. In this study, Kocaeli province, where urbanization and industrialization is high, is selected. The data used in the study has been obtained from the Online Monitoring Center established by the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization to monitor air quality. Air quality index was calculated with the report containing the measurement values of the pollutant gases belonging to Kocaeli, and labeled by separating them into their classes. In order to predict the air quality on the prepared data set, the comparison of different machine and deep learning techniques is conducted. These techniques are k-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM). According to experimental results, by considering the accuracy and AUC parameter used in the performance evaluation of the classification techniques, the highest accuracy value was observed as 94% with the Decision Trees and the highest AUC value was reported as 98% with the LSTM model.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Water Consumption Prediction: A Case Study from Kocaeli Province
    Gorenekli, Kasim
    Gulbag, Ali
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (17)
  • [2] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for the prediction of air pollution: a case study from China
    Ishan Ayus
    Narayanan Natarajan
    Deepak Gupta
    Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 17
  • [3] Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for the prediction of air pollution: a case study from China
    Ayus, Ishan
    Natarajan, Narayanan
    Gupta, Deepak
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [4] Machine learning for air quality index (AQI) forecasting: shallow learning or deep learning?
    Kalantari, Elham
    Gholami, Hamid
    Malakooti, Hossein
    Nafarzadegan, Ali Reza
    Moosavi, Vahid
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (54) : 62962 - 62982
  • [5] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Diabetic Kidney Disease
    David, Satish Kumar
    Rafiullah, Mohamed
    Siddiqui, Khalid
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [6] MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO PREDICT AND COMPARE THE AIR QUALITY INDEX IN A CONFINED ENVIRONMENT
    Kumar, Sampath harish
    Kanish, Thorapadi chandrasekaran
    ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ENGINEERING, 2024, 50 (04): : 5 - 27
  • [7] Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Spatiotemporal Air Quality Prediction
    Agbehadji, Israel Edem
    Obagbuwa, Ibidun Christiana
    Atmosphere, 15 (11):
  • [8] Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Spatiotemporal Air Quality Prediction
    Agbehadji, Israel Edem
    Obagbuwa, Ibidun Christiana
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (11)
  • [9] Predicting air quality index and fine particulate matter levels in Bagdad city using advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques
    Khadom, Anees A.
    Albawi, Saad
    Abboud, Ali J.
    Mahood, Hameed B.
    Hassan, Qusay
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2024, 262
  • [10] PREDICTION OF AIR QUALITY INDEX BASED ON METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
    Uguz, Sinan
    Oral, Okan
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (08): : 10057 - 10077