Association Between Donor-Recipient Biological Relationship and Allograft Outcomes After Living Donor Kidney Transplant

被引:17
|
作者
Husain, S. Ali [1 ,2 ]
King, Kristen L. [1 ,2 ]
Sanichar, Navin [3 ]
Crew, R. John [1 ]
Schold, Jesse D. [4 ,5 ]
Mohan, Sumit [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ Renal Epidemiol CURE Grp, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Ctr Populat Hlth Res, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5718
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The proportion of living donor kidney transplants from donors unrelated to their recipients is increasing in the US. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between donor-recipient biological relationship and allograft survival after living donor kidney transplant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data on US adult living donor kidney transplants (n = 86 154) performed from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, excluding cases in which recipients previously received a kidney transplant (n = 10 342) or key data were missing (n = 2832). Last follow-up was March 20, 2020. EXPOSURES Donor-recipient biological relationship. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was death-censored allograft failure. Univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses were performed for death-censored allograft failure for the overall cohort, then separately for recipients with and without primary diagnoses of cystic kidney disease and for transplants from African American and non-African American donors. RESULTS Among the 72 980 transplant donor and recipients included in the study (median donor age, 41 years; interquartile range [IQR], 32-50 years; 43 990 [60%] female; 50 014 [69%] White), 43 174 (59%) donors and recipients were biologically related and 29 806 (41%) were unrelated. Donors related to their recipients were younger (median [IQR] age, 39 [31-48] vs 44 [35-52] years) and less likely to be female (24 848 [58%] vs 19 142 [64%]) or White (26 933 [62%] vs 23 081 [77%]). Recipients related to their donors were younger (median [IQR] age, 48 [34-58] vs 50 [40-58] years), more likely to be female (18 035 [42%] vs 10 530 [35%]), and less likely to have cystic kidney disease (2530 [6%] vs 4600 [15%]). Related pairs had fewer HLA mismatches overall (median [IQR], 3 [2-3] vs 5 [4-5]). After adjustment for HLA mismatches, donor and recipient characteristics, and transplant era, donor-recipient biological relationship was associated with higher death-censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P = .03). When stratified by primary disease, this association persisted only for recipients without cystic kidney disease. When stratified by donor race, this association persisted only for transplants from African American donors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, living donor kidney transplants from donors biologically related to their recipients had higher rates of allograft failure than transplants from donors unrelated to their recipients after HLA matching was accounted for. Further study is needed to determine which genetic or socioenvironmental factors are associated with this finding.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adult Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation, Donor Age, and Donor-Recipient Age
    Hiramitsu, Takahisa
    Tomosugi, Toshihide
    Futamura, Kenta
    Okada, Manabu
    Matsuoka, Yutaka
    Goto, Norihiko
    Ichimori, Toshihiro
    Narumi, Shunji
    Takeda, Asami
    Kobayashi, Takaaki
    Uchida, Kazuharu
    Watarai, Yoshihiko
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2021, 6 (12): : 3026 - 3034
  • [22] Impact of Donor and Recipient Age on Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplant
    Nakamura, Tsukasa
    Nobori, Shuji
    Harada, Shumpei
    Sugimoto, Ryusuke
    Yoshikawa, Mikiko
    Ushigome, Hidetaka
    Yoshimura, Norio
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 54 (02) : 438 - 442
  • [23] Kidney Transplantation of Living Unrelated Donor-Recipient Combinations
    Ishikawa, N.
    Yagisawa, T.
    Sakuma, Y.
    Fujiwara, T.
    Kimura, T.
    Nukui, A.
    Yashi, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (01) : 254 - 256
  • [24] Impact of Size Matching Based on Donor-Recipient Height on Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Tandukar, Srijan
    Wu, Christine
    Hariharan, Sundaram
    Puttarajappa, Chethan
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 35
  • [25] The Effect of Donor-Recipient Relationship on the Immunologic Outcome in Living Kidney Transplantation.
    Lehner, L.
    Duerr, M.
    Waiser, J.
    Budde, K.
    Staeck, O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 446 - 446
  • [26] Minding the Missing Link: The Effect of Donor-Recipient Pairing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Vinson, Amanda J.
    Tennankore, Karthik K.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 13 (10): : 1581 - 1583
  • [27] Kidney Transplant Outcomes by Living Donor (LD) Relationship
    Skeans, M.
    Snyder, J.
    Matas, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 : 307 - 307
  • [28] Impact of donor-recipient bloodtype within a living donor kidney exchange program
    de Klerk, M
    Keizer, K
    Haase, B
    Weimar, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 411 - 412
  • [29] Risk of Acute Rejection by Living Donor-Recipient Relationship
    Yoeli, Dor
    Bababekov, Yanik
    Choudhurry, Rashikh
    Jackson, Whitney
    Moore, Hunter
    Adams, Megan
    Pshak, Thomas
    Conzen, Kendra
    Nydam, Trevor
    Bak, Tom
    Wachs, Michael
    Schold, Jesse
    Pomposelli, James
    Pomfret, Elizabeth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 24 (01) : S103 - S103
  • [30] Optimizing living donor kidney graft function by donor-recipient pair selection
    Brennan, Todd V.
    Bostrom, Alan
    Feng, Sandy
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 82 (05) : 651 - 656