Miniaturised broth microdilution for simplified antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram negative clinical isolates using microcapillary devices

被引:0
|
作者
Needs, Sarah H. [1 ]
Saiprom, Natnaree [2 ]
Rafaque, Zara [3 ]
Imtiaz, Wajiha [4 ]
Chantratita, Narisara [2 ]
Runcharoen, Chakkaphan [2 ]
Thammachote, Jeeranan [5 ]
Anun, Suthatip [5 ]
Peacock, Sharon J. [6 ]
Ray, Partha [7 ,9 ]
Andrews, Simon [4 ]
Edwards, Alexander D. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Pharm, Reading RG6 6DX, Berks, England
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Trop Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Salaya, Thailand
[3] Hazara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Microbiol, Mansehra, Pakistan
[4] Univ Reading, Sch Biol Sci, Reading RG6 6DX, Berks, England
[5] Bhuddhasothon Hosp, Med Technol Dept, Div Clin Microbiol, Chachoengsao, Thailand
[6] Univ Cambridge, Dept Med, Cambridge, England
[7] Nature Conservancy, Charlottesville, VA USA
[8] CFT Ltd, Daux Rd, Billinghurst RH14 9SJ, England
[9] Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Reading, Berks, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES; QUANTITATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1039/d2an00305h
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Antibiotic resistance is a major global challenge. Although microfluidic antibiotic susceptibility tests (AST) offer great potential for rapid and portable testing to inform correct antibiotic selection, the impact of miniaturisation on broth microdilution (BMD) is not fully understood. We developed a 10-plex microcapillary based broth microdilution using resazurin as a colorimetric indicator for bacterial growth. Each capillary had a 1 microlitre capillary volume, 100 times smaller than microplate broth microdilution. The microcapillary BMD was compared to an in-house standard microplate AST and commercial Vitek 2 system. When tested with 25 uropathogenic isolates (20 Escherichia coli and 5 Klebsiella pneumoniae) and 2 reference E. coli, these devices gave 96.1% (441/459 isolate/antibiotic combinations) categorical agreement, across 17 therapeutically beneficial antibiotics, compared to in-house microplate BMD with resazurin. A further 99 (50 E. coli and 49 K. pneumoniae) clinical isolates were tested against 10 antibiotics and showed 92.3% categorical agreement (914/990 isolate/antibiotic combinations) compared to the Vitek 2 measurements. These microcapillary tests showed excellent analytical agreement with existing AST methods. Furthermore, the small size and simple colour change can be recorded using a smartphone camera or it is feasible to follow growth kinetics using very simple, low-cost readers. The test strips used here are produced in large batches, allowing hundreds of multiplex tests to be made and tested rapidly. Demonstrating performance of miniaturised broth microdilution with clinical isolates paves the way for wider use of microfluidic AST.
引用
收藏
页码:3558 / 3569
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Etest with the broth microdilution method in susceptibility testing of yeast isolates against four antifungals
    Koç, AN
    Gökahmetoglu, S
    Oguzkaya, M
    MYCOSES, 2000, 43 (7-8) : 293 - 297
  • [22] Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Nocardia spp. isolates by broth microdilution with resazurin and spectrophotometry
    Caso Coelho, Vivian
    Pereira Neves, Samara D'Ajuda
    Cintra Giudice, Mauro
    Benard, Gil
    Lopes, Marta Heloisa
    Sato, Paula Keiko
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [23] Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Nocardia spp. isolates by broth microdilution with resazurin and spectrophotometry
    Vivian Caso Coelho
    Samara D’Ajuda Pereira Neves
    Mauro Cintra Giudice
    Gil Benard
    Marta Heloisa Lopes
    Paula Keiko Sato
    BMC Microbiology, 21
  • [24] Evaluation of broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Brazilian clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates to five antifungal drugs
    Dias, ALT
    Matsumoto, FE
    Melhem, MSC
    Costa, SOP
    Siqueira, AM
    Paula, CR
    TRENDS IN MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2003, : 123 - 125
  • [25] Comparison of the Etest and broth microdilution method for tigecycline susceptibility testing against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii from Taiwan
    Liu, Jien-Wei
    Jang, Tsrang-Neng
    Cheng, Yu-Jen
    Hsu, Gwo-Jong
    Sun, Wu
    Lu, Chin-Te
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 35 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [26] Evaluation of new broth media for microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing of Lactobacilli, Pediococci, Lactococci, and Bifidobacteria
    Klare, I
    Konstabel, C
    Müller-Bertling, S
    Reissbrodtl, R
    Huys, G
    Vancanneyt, M
    Swings, J
    Goossens, H
    Witte, W
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (12) : 8982 - 8986
  • [27] Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: a Comparison to Disk Diffusion to Broth Microdilution
    Morris, C. Paul
    Bergman, Yehudit
    Tekle, Tsigedera
    Fissel, John A.
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Simner, Patricia J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)
  • [28] Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Helicobacter cinaedi
    Tomida, Junko
    Oumi, Ayako
    Okamoto, Tatsuya
    Morita, Yuji
    Okayama, Akihiko
    Misawa, Naoaki
    Hayashi, Tetsuya
    Akaike, Takaaki
    Kawamura, Yoshiaki
    MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 57 (05) : 353 - 358
  • [29] RAPID ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF GRAM-NEGATIVE CLINICAL ISOLATES WITH THE AUTOMICROBIC SYSTEM
    BACKES, BA
    CAVALIERI, SJ
    RUDRIK, JT
    BRITT, EM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (06) : 744 - 747
  • [30] Performance of disk diffusion and broth microdilution for fosfomycin susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Fernanda Mojica, Maria
    De La Cadena, Elsa
    Hernandez-Gomez, Cristhian
    Correa, Adriana
    Manuel Appel, Tobias
    Jose Pallares, Christian
    Virginia Villegas, Maria
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2020, 21 : 391 - 395