Women's Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study

被引:57
|
作者
Lewis, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Hill, Melissa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chitty, Lyn S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, London WC1N 1EH, England
[2] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, London WC1N 1EH, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, North East Thames Reg Genet Serv, London WC1N 3BH, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
CELL-FREE DNA; DOWN-SYNDROME; DIAGNOSIS; ATTITUDES; DECISION; ANXIETY; CHOICE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0153147
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy is currently only available in the UK through the private sector outside of the research arena. As part of an implementation study in the UK National Health Service we conducted a mixed methods study to assess women's experience of being offered NIPT using validated measures of decisional conflict, decisional regret and anxiety. Clinical service preferences were also explored. Women with a Down syndrome screening risk >1: 1000 were invited to take part in the study and offered NIPT, NIPT and invasive testing (for women with a risk above 1: 150) or no further testing. A cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted at two time points; at the time of testing and one month following receipt of results (or equivalent for NIPT decliners). In total, 845 questionnaires and 81 interviews were analysed. The main motivation to accept NIPT was for reassurance (30.8%). Decisional conflict occurred in a minimal number of cases (3.8%), however, none of the participants experienced decisional regret. Around a third (29.9%) of women had elevated anxiety at the time of testing, including intermediate risk women who traditionally would not be offered further testing (54.4% high risk; 20.1% medium risk), a finding supported through the qualitative interviews where prolonged or additional anxiety was found to occur in some medium risk cases. Women were overwhelmingly positive about the opportunity to have a test that was procedurally safe, accurate, reduced the need for invasive testing and identified cases of Down syndrome that might otherwise have been missed. Reassurance was identified as the main motivator for accepting NIPT, particularly amongst medium risk women, with high risk women inclined to accept NIPT to inform decisions around invasive testing. The current turnaround time for test result was identified as a key limitation. All the women interviewed thought NIPT should be adopted as part of NHS clinical practice, with the majority favouring NIPT offered as a first-line test. Our study highlights the potential that NIPT has to positively impact women's experience of prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is the best clinical approach after a non-invasive prenatal testing test failure in women at high risk for aneuploidy?
    Humphrey, Whitney M.
    Griffin, Emily
    Lee, Vanessa R.
    Aviram, Amir
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S252 - S252
  • [32] Experiences of pregnant women with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing in a national screening program
    Karuna R. M. van der Meij
    Qiu Ying. F. van de Pol
    Mireille N. Bekker
    Linda Martin
    Janneke Gitsels-van der Wal
    Elsbeth H. van Vliet-Lachotzki
    Janneke M. Weiss
    Robert-Jan H. Galjaard
    Erik A. Sistermans
    Merryn V. E. Macville
    Lidewij Henneman
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2023, 31 : 555 - 561
  • [33] Experiences of pregnant women with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing in a national screening program
    van der Meij, Karuna R. M.
    van de Pol, Qiu Ying. F.
    Bekker, Mireille N' H.
    Martin, Linda M.
    Gitsels-van der Wal, Janneke
    van Vliet-Lachotzki, Elsbeth H. A.
    Weiss, Janneke M.
    Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
    Sistermans, Erik A.
    Macville, Merryn V. E.
    Henneman, Lidewij H.
    Dutch NIPT Consortium
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 (05) : 555 - 561
  • [34] Women's preferences for childbirth experiences in the Republic of Ireland; a mixed methods study
    Larkin, Patricia
    Begley, Cecily M.
    Devane, Declan
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [35] Women’s preferences for childbirth experiences in the Republic of Ireland; a mixed methods study
    Patricia Larkin
    Cecily M. Begley
    Declan Devane
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [36] Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for Down's syndrome: views and preferences from the service users' perspective
    Lewis, Celine
    Silcock, C.
    Hill, M.
    Skirton, H.
    Chitty, L. S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2012, 49 : S96 - S96
  • [37] Hospital funded Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Women at Increased Risk of Aneuploidy based on First or Second Trimester Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Thomas, A.
    Edwards, L.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 : 65 - 65
  • [38] Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions
    Vanstone, Meredith
    Cernat, Alexandra
    Nisker, Jeff
    Schwartz, Lisa
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 19
  • [39] Women’s perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions
    Meredith Vanstone
    Alexandra Cernat
    Jeff Nisker
    Lisa Schwartz
    BMC Medical Ethics, 19
  • [40] Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
    Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
    Yi, Huso
    Ahmed, Shenaz
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18 : 1 - 10