Women's Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study

被引:57
|
作者
Lewis, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Hill, Melissa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chitty, Lyn S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, London WC1N 1EH, England
[2] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, London WC1N 1EH, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, North East Thames Reg Genet Serv, London WC1N 3BH, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
CELL-FREE DNA; DOWN-SYNDROME; DIAGNOSIS; ATTITUDES; DECISION; ANXIETY; CHOICE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0153147
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy is currently only available in the UK through the private sector outside of the research arena. As part of an implementation study in the UK National Health Service we conducted a mixed methods study to assess women's experience of being offered NIPT using validated measures of decisional conflict, decisional regret and anxiety. Clinical service preferences were also explored. Women with a Down syndrome screening risk >1: 1000 were invited to take part in the study and offered NIPT, NIPT and invasive testing (for women with a risk above 1: 150) or no further testing. A cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted at two time points; at the time of testing and one month following receipt of results (or equivalent for NIPT decliners). In total, 845 questionnaires and 81 interviews were analysed. The main motivation to accept NIPT was for reassurance (30.8%). Decisional conflict occurred in a minimal number of cases (3.8%), however, none of the participants experienced decisional regret. Around a third (29.9%) of women had elevated anxiety at the time of testing, including intermediate risk women who traditionally would not be offered further testing (54.4% high risk; 20.1% medium risk), a finding supported through the qualitative interviews where prolonged or additional anxiety was found to occur in some medium risk cases. Women were overwhelmingly positive about the opportunity to have a test that was procedurally safe, accurate, reduced the need for invasive testing and identified cases of Down syndrome that might otherwise have been missed. Reassurance was identified as the main motivator for accepting NIPT, particularly amongst medium risk women, with high risk women inclined to accept NIPT to inform decisions around invasive testing. The current turnaround time for test result was identified as a key limitation. All the women interviewed thought NIPT should be adopted as part of NHS clinical practice, with the majority favouring NIPT offered as a first-line test. Our study highlights the potential that NIPT has to positively impact women's experience of prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy - It's time
    Maxwell, Susannah
    O'Leary, Peter
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (04): : 385 - 387
  • [2] Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland: a qualitative analysis
    Fang, Mirriam Tyebally
    Germani, Federico
    Spitale, Giovanni
    Wascher, Sebastian
    Kunz, Ladina
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [3] Women’s experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland: a qualitative analysis
    Mirriam Tyebally Fang
    Federico Germani
    Giovanni Spitale
    Sebastian Wäscher
    Ladina Kunz
    Nikola Biller-Andorno
    BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [4] Pregnant women's experiences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan: A qualitative study
    Yamamoto, Kayono
    Chang, Hyangri
    Fukushima, Akimune
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2022, 31 (02) : 338 - 355
  • [5] Creating basis for introducing non-invasive prenatal testing in the Estonian public health setting
    Zilina, Olga
    Rekker, Kadri
    Kaplinski, Lauris
    Sauk, Martin
    Paluoja, Priit
    Teder, Hindrek
    Ustav, Eva-Liina
    Tonisson, Neeme
    Reimand, Tiia
    Ridnoi, Konstantin
    Palta, Priit
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Krjutskov, Kaarel
    Kurg, Ants
    Salumets, Andres
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2019, 39 (13) : 1262 - 1268
  • [6] Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol
    Melissa Hill
    David Wright
    Rebecca Daley
    Celine Lewis
    Fiona McKay
    Sarah Mason
    Nicholas Lench
    Abigail Howarth
    Christopher Boustred
    Kitty Lo
    Vincent Plagnol
    Kevin Spencer
    Jane Fisher
    Mark Kroese
    Stephen Morris
    Lyn S Chitty
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [7] Evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy in an NHS setting: a reliable accurate prenatal non-invasive diagnosis (RAPID) protocol
    Hill, Melissa
    Wright, David
    Daley, Rebecca
    Lewis, Celine
    Mckay, Fiona
    Mason, Sarah
    Lench, Nicholas
    Howarth, Abigail
    Boustred, Christopher
    Lo, Kitty
    Plagnol, Vincent
    Spencer, Kevin
    Fisher, Jane
    Kroese, Mark
    Morris, Stephen
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2014, 14
  • [8] Women's choices for invasive or non-invasive testing: influence of gestational age and service delivery
    Chen, An
    Tenhunen, Henni
    Torkki, Paulus
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Lillrank, Paul
    Stefanovic, Vedran
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2016, 36 (13) : 1217 - 1224
  • [9] Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: A Study of Public Attitudes
    Kelly, S. E.
    Farrimond, H. R.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2012, 15 (02) : 73 - 81
  • [10] 'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing
    Bowman-Smart, Hilary
    Savulescu, Julian
    Mand, Cara
    Gyngell, Christopher
    Pertile, Mark D.
    Lewis, Sharon
    Delatycki, Martin B.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (05): : 649 - 655