Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose -: Comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon

被引:58
|
作者
Strotzer, M [1 ]
Gmeinwieser, JK [1 ]
Völk, M [1 ]
Fründ, R [1 ]
Seitz, J [1 ]
Feuerbach, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
radiography; digital; amorphous silicon; receiver operating characteristic curve;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199802000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors compared a solid-state amorphous silicon (a-Si) detector and screen-film radiography (SFR) with regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary lesions. Evaluation of the impact of a dose reduction of 50% with this digital flat-panel detector was of special interest. METHODS. A self-scanning flat-panel detector, based on a-Si technology with 143 x 143 mu m pixel size, 1 k x 1 k matrix and 12-bit digital output was used. An asymmetric state-of-the-art screen-film system was compared with a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images and at a dose reduced by 50%. An anthropomorphic chest phantom was superimposed by templates containing nodules, linear structures, reticular, and micronodular opacities in a random distribution. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 23,040 observations made by four independent observers. Student's t test (95% confidence-level) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images were significantly superior to SFR with respect to the detectability of lines (P = 0.01) and micronodular opacities (P < 0.01). For the other objects and the a-Si images taken at a reduced dose, it yielded no statistically significant differences between both imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS. The results of this phantom study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction in chest radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy compared with SFR.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical application and experimental evaluation of a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon (a-Si): Image quality and potential of dose reduction in skeletal radiography
    Strotzer, M
    Gmeinwieser, JK
    Voelk, M
    Fruend, R
    Seitz, JM
    Spies, V
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1501 - 1501
  • [32] Ability of chest X-ray to detect faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation in images of computed tomography: A comparison between flat-panel detector radiography and film-screen radiography
    Nagatani, Yukihiro
    Nitta, Norihisa
    Ikeda, Mitsuru
    Kitahara, Hitoshi
    Otani, Hideji
    Seko, Ayumi
    Tanaka, Toyohiko
    Murakami, Yoko
    Takahashi, Masashi
    Murata, Kiyoshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (03) : 384 - 390
  • [33] Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: Comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems
    Bacher, Klaus
    Smeets, Peter
    Vereecken, Ludo
    De Hauwere, An
    Duyck, Philippe
    De Man, Robert
    Verstraete, Koenraad
    Thierens, Hubert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (03) : 630 - 637
  • [34] Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems - A contrast-detail phantom study
    Rong, XJJ
    Shaw, CC
    Liu, XM
    Lemacks, MR
    Thompson, SK
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (11) : 2328 - 2335
  • [35] Improved contrast-detail detection with flat-panel digital radiography: Comparison with computed radiography and a conventional film-screen system
    Erb, G
    Aretz, K
    Hahmann, M
    Radeleff, BA
    Hansmann, J
    Kauffmann, GW
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 164 - 164
  • [36] Digital chest radiography with a large area 43 x 43cm flat panel silicon X-ray detector: Clinical comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of anatomic regions
    Hennigs, SP
    Jaeger, HJ
    Garmer, M
    Gissler, M
    Christmann, A
    Mathias, KD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 429 - 429
  • [37] Amorphous silicon technology based digital radiography of the skeleton: Image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography
    Volk, M
    Strotzer, M
    Holzknecht, N
    Manke, C
    Lenhart, M
    Gmeinwieser, JK
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 328 - 328
  • [38] Finding an improved amorphous-silicon x-ray flat-panel detector configuration for the in-line geometry
    Fast, M. F.
    Teymurazyan, A.
    Pang, G.
    Oelfke, U.
    Rowlands, J. A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (07): : 2305 - 2324
  • [39] Comparison of a flat-panel digital system with a conventional screen-film system: Anatomical visibility and image quality in chest radiographs of 70 oncology patients
    Fink, C
    Hansmann, J
    Hallscheidt, PJ
    Noeldge, G
    Kampschulte, A
    Kauffmann, GW
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 547 - 547
  • [40] EFFECTS OF REDUCED EXPOSURE ON COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF NODULE DETECTION ACCURACY WITH CONVENTIONAL AND ASYMMETRIC SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHS OF A CHEST PHANTOM
    KIMMESMITH, C
    ABERLE, DR
    SAYRE, JW
    HART, EM
    GREAVES, SM
    BROWN, K
    YOUNG, DA
    DESERAN, MD
    JOHNSON, T
    JOHNSON, SL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) : 269 - 273