Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose -: Comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon

被引:58
|
作者
Strotzer, M [1 ]
Gmeinwieser, JK [1 ]
Völk, M [1 ]
Fründ, R [1 ]
Seitz, J [1 ]
Feuerbach, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
radiography; digital; amorphous silicon; receiver operating characteristic curve;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199802000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The authors compared a solid-state amorphous silicon (a-Si) detector and screen-film radiography (SFR) with regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary lesions. Evaluation of the impact of a dose reduction of 50% with this digital flat-panel detector was of special interest. METHODS. A self-scanning flat-panel detector, based on a-Si technology with 143 x 143 mu m pixel size, 1 k x 1 k matrix and 12-bit digital output was used. An asymmetric state-of-the-art screen-film system was compared with a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images and at a dose reduced by 50%. An anthropomorphic chest phantom was superimposed by templates containing nodules, linear structures, reticular, and micronodular opacities in a random distribution. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 23,040 observations made by four independent observers. Student's t test (95% confidence-level) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images were significantly superior to SFR with respect to the detectability of lines (P = 0.01) and micronodular opacities (P < 0.01). For the other objects and the a-Si images taken at a reduced dose, it yielded no statistically significant differences between both imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS. The results of this phantom study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction in chest radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy compared with SFR.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography.
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Grabbe, E
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (11): : 940 - 945
  • [2] Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography -: Effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures
    Strotzer, M
    Gmeinwieser, J
    Spahn, M
    Völk, M
    Fründ, R
    Seitz, J
    Spies, V
    Alexander, J
    Feuerbach, S
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [3] Flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: Phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings
    Rapp-Bernhardt, U
    Roehl, FW
    Gibbs, RC
    Schmidl, H
    Krause, UW
    Bernhardt, TM
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) : 484 - 492
  • [4] Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector
    Hosch, WP
    Fink, C
    Radeleff, B
    Kampschulte, A
    Kauffmann, GW
    Hansmann, J
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (10) : 902 - 907
  • [5] Flat-panel X-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology - Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies
    Volk, M
    Strotzer, M
    Gmeinwieser, J
    Alexander, J
    Frund, R
    Seitz, J
    Manke, C
    Spahn, M
    Feuerbach, S
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1997, 32 (07) : 373 - 377
  • [6] Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography
    Svenja P. Hennigs
    Marietta Garmer
    Horst J. Jaeger
    Reinhard Classen
    Andreas Jacobs
    Hans M. Gissler
    Andreas Christmann
    Klaus Mathias
    European Radiology, 2001, 11 : 1688 - 1696
  • [7] Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography
    Hennigs, SP
    Garmer, M
    Jaeger, HJ
    Classen, R
    Jacobs, A
    Gissler, HM
    Christmann, A
    Mathias, K
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) : 1688 - 1696
  • [8] Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: Comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography
    Ludwig, K
    Lenzen, H
    Kamm, KF
    Link, TM
    Diederich, S
    Wormanns, D
    Heindel, W
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) : 453 - 459
  • [9] Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector vs screen-film and storage phosphor systems in chest imaging: Comparison of the entrance skin dose
    Smeets, PV
    Bacher, K
    Duyck, P
    Verstraete, KL
    Thierens, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 382 - 382
  • [10] DETECTION OF SIMULATED CHEST LESIONS - COMPARISON OF A CONVENTIONAL SCREEN-FILM COMBINATION, AN ASYMMETRIC SCREEN-FILM SYSTEM, AND STORAGE PHOSPHOR RADIOGRAPHY
    LEPPERT, AGA
    PROKOP, M
    SCHAEFERPROKOP, CM
    GALANSKI, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (01) : 259 - 263