Robust processing of magnetotelluric data from the auroral zone

被引:26
|
作者
Garcia, X
Chave, AD
Jones, AG
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Geol Dinam & Geofis, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[3] Geol Survey Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0Y3, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.5636/jgg.49.1451
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Magnetotelluric (MT) data acquired during September-October, 1994, in northern Canada, were strongly influenced by non-uniform source field contributions from the auroral electrojet, and especially by intense auroral episodes. The largest effect on the estimate of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor elements was during intervals of highest magnetic activity, which primarily correlated with high auroral activity and was observed during local nighttime. In comparison, during the day the effect on the normal magnetotelluric impedance tensor response was usually, but not always, small. A robust controlled-leverage processing algorithm was applied to these data in an attempt to extract the stable uniform field estimates of the impedance. The differences between nonrobust and robust processing of the entire data set is compared to that obtained after dividing the time series into daytime and nighttime segments. The nonrobust estimate using all data is controlled by the nocturnal data, which are, in turn, dominated by non-uniform source effects. However, nonrobust processing of only the daytime data fails to recover a useful result. There is little difference between the robust response for the entire and daytime data provided that the fraction of auroral activity is not large, i.e., in excess of half of the available data series. In addition, examination of the time-dependence of the response functions shows that the strongest bias is observed during the initial quarter of an auroral event.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1468
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Crust structure and composition in the southern Siberian craton (influence zone of Baikal rifting), from magnetotelluric data
    Epov, M. I.
    Pospeeva, E. V.
    Vitte, L. V.
    RUSSIAN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 53 (03) : 293 - 306
  • [32] AURORAL ZONE EFFECTS
    LOKKEN, JE
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS SECTION D-RADIO SCIENCE, 1965, D 69 (08): : 1190 - &
  • [33] THEORY OF THE AURORAL ZONE
    MENZEL, DH
    WARWICK, JW
    LAWRENCE, RS
    SCIENCE, 1955, 121 (3148) : 624 - 624
  • [34] AURORAL ABSORPTION ZONE
    BASLER, RP
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1962, 67 (09): : 3540 - &
  • [35] MAGNETOTELLURIC VARIATION PROCESSING
    SVETOV, BS
    SHIMELEVICH, MI
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 9 (3-4) : 259 - 285
  • [36] Robust Magnetotelluric Impedance Estimation
    Sutarno, D.
    4TH ASIAN PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM: AN INTERNATIONAL EVENT, 2010, 1325 : 24 - 27
  • [37] Petrological interpretation of the magnetotelluric data of the depth zone of the Tarim and Tien Shan junction
    V. Yu. Batalev
    Doklady Earth Sciences, 2011, 438
  • [38] New application of wavelets in magnetotelluric data processing: reducing impedance bias
    Hugo Larnier
    Pascal Sailhac
    Aude Chambodut
    Earth, Planets and Space, 68
  • [39] Geoelectric investigation of the Hellenic subduction zone using long period magnetotelluric data
    Galanopoulos, D
    Sakkas, V
    Kosmatos, D
    Lagios, E
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2005, 409 (1-4) : 73 - 84
  • [40] Coordinate Attention-Temporal Convolutional Network for Magnetotelluric Data Processing
    Li, Jin
    Cheng, Hong
    Wang, Jiayu
    Zhang, Xian
    Tang, Jingtian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62