Heterogeneity of MYO15A variants significantly determine the feasibility of acoustic stimulation with hearing aid and cochlear implant

被引:4
|
作者
Na, Gina [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Hye Ji [1 ]
Joo, Sun Young [3 ,4 ]
Rim, John Hoon [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Jung Ah [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Hye-Youn [3 ,4 ]
Yu, Seyoung [3 ,4 ]
Jeong, Yeonsu [1 ]
Shin, Geun Cheol [1 ]
Noh, Hae Eun [1 ]
Lee, Ho Young [1 ]
Kim, Da Hye [1 ]
Gee, Heon Yung [3 ,4 ]
Jung, Jinsei [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Jae Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Coll Med, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea 21 Project, Grad Sch Med Sci, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
DFNB3; MYO15A; Genetic hearing loss; Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic stimulation; Residual hearing; Hearing aid; Precision medicine; MUTATIONAL SPECTRUM; MYOSIN-XVA; DOMAIN; GENE; DEAFNESS; REVEALS; FAMILY; REGION; SH3;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2021.108227
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 (DFNB3) mainly leads to congenital and severe-to-profound hearing impairment, which is caused by variants in MYO15A. However, audiological heterogeneity in patients with DFNB3 hinders precision medicine in hearing rehabilitation. Here, we aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of the auditory phenotypes of MYO15A variants according to the affected domain and the feasibilities for acoustic stimulation. We conducted whole-exome sequencing for 10 unrelated individuals from seven multiplex families with DFNB3; 11 MYO15A variants, including the novel frameshift c.900delT (p.Pro301Argfs*143) and nonsense c.4879G > T (p.Glu1627*) variants, were identified. In seven probands, residual hearing at low frequencies was significantly higher in the groups with one or two N-terminal frameshift variants in trans conformation compared to that in the group without these variants. This is consistent with the 56 individuals from the previously published reports that carried a varying number of N-terminal truncating variants in MYO15A. In addition, patients with missense variants in the second FERM domain had better hearing at low frequencies than patients without these variants. Subsequently, acoustic stimulation provided by devices such as hearing aids or cochlear implants was feasible in patients with one or two N-terminal truncating variants or a second FERM missense variant. In conclusion, N-terminal or second FERM variants in MYO15A allow the practical use of acoustic stimulation through hearing aids or electroacoustic stimulation for aural rehabilitation. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System
    Lenarz, T.
    Schwab, B.
    Maier, H.
    Kludt, E.
    HNO, 2014, 62 (07) : 481 - 489
  • [22] Speech Perception and Localisation with SCORE Bimodal: A Loudness Normalisation Strategy for Combined Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Stimulation
    Francart, Tom
    McDermott, Hugh
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [23] Interaural stimulation timing mismatch in listeners provided with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid A review focusing on quantification and compensation
    Zirn, Stefan
    Hemmert, Werner
    Roth, Sebastian
    Mueller, Franz-Ullrich
    Angermeier, Julian
    HNO, 2023, 71 (08) : 513 - 520
  • [24] Perception of Suprasegmental Speech Features via Bimodal Stimulation: Cochlear Implant on One Ear and Hearing Aid on the Other
    Most, Tova
    Harel, Tamar
    Shpak, Talma
    Luntz, Michal
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 54 (02): : 668 - 678
  • [25] Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children
    Jafari, Narges
    Yadegari, Fariba
    Jalaie, Shohreh
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2016, 30 (06) : 763.e1 - 763.e7
  • [26] Feasibility of Using Electrocochleography for Objective Estimation of Electro-Acoustic Interactions in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing
    Koka, Kanthaiah
    Litvak, Leonid M.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11 : 1 - 9
  • [27] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Viral D. Tejani
    Hyejin Yang
    Jeong-Seo Kim
    Helin Hernandez
    Jacob J. Oleson
    Marlan R. Hansen
    Bruce J. Gantz
    Paul J. Abbas
    Carolyn J. Brown
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2022, 23 : 95 - 118
  • [28] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Yang, Hyejin
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Hernandez, Helin
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01): : 95 - 118
  • [29] Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation
    Nix, Evan P.
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    Selleck, A. Morgan
    Overton, Andrea B.
    Canfarotta, Michael W.
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (10) : 1004 - 1010
  • [30] Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing
    Tan, Chin-Tuan
    Martin, Brett
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (03) : 187 - 199