Tinnitus and cognitive interference: A Stroop paradigm study

被引:99
|
作者
Andersson, G
Eriksson, J
Lundh, LG
Lyttkens, L
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Psychol, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Audiol, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
tinnitus; Stroop; psychology; cognition; concentration problems;
D O I
10.1044/jslhr.4305.1168
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate cognitive interference caused by tinnitus by means of a modified version of the Stroop color-word test. In a mixed-design study, the performances of tinnitus patients (n = 23) and healthy controls with normal hearing (n = 23) were compared on three versions of the Stroop test: the original version, a modified version including physical-threat words, and a tinnitus version for which tinnitus words [descriptors of tinnitus; e.g., peep) were derived empirically. Matched control conditions (words) were included for all three versions, yielding a total of six screens that were presented on a computer. Participants in the control group were matched with the patients for age and gender. Main dependent measures were performance on the Stroop tests in terms of total time for completing each test. Also included were the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the state version of the Spielberger Trait State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and a subtest from the Wechsler Adult intelligence Scale measuring verbal ability Results showed that tinnitus patients performed significantly slower on all six test conditions. The classical Stroop color-word interference was replicated in both groups. Also, an effect For physical-threat words was found for both groups. Our expected tinnitus word interference could not be established. Patients scored significantly higher than controls on the BDI and the STAI, but these measures did not correlate with the Stroop results. In conclusion, the results indicate that tinnitus patients have impaired cognitive performance overall, as measured by these variations of the Stroop paradigm, but hearing impairment cannot be excluded as a possible confounder.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1173
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reduced inter-hemispheric interference in ageing: Evidence from a divided field Stroop paradigm
    Delvenne, Jean-Francois
    Castronovo, Julie
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2018, 122 : 26 - 33
  • [42] Strategies that reduce Stroop interference
    Palfi, B.
    Parris, B. A.
    Collins, A. F.
    Dienes, Z.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (03):
  • [43] LOCUS OF INTERFERENCE ON STROOP TEST
    WHEELER, DD
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1977, 45 (01) : 263 - 266
  • [44] Word and position interference in stroop tasks: a behavioral and fMRI study
    Giada Zoccatelli
    Alberto Beltramello
    Franco Alessandrini
    Francesca Benedetta Pizzini
    Giancarlo Tassinari
    Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 207 : 139 - 147
  • [45] An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop interference effect.
    Liotti, M
    Woldorff, MG
    Perez, R
    Mayberg, HS
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, : 56 - 56
  • [46] PRIMING EFFECT ON STROOP INTERFERENCE
    CHIHARA, T
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 1988, 31 (03) : 136 - 145
  • [47] Proofreaders' decreased Stroop interference
    Borzoni, S
    Hines, T
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1996, 82 (03) : 1104 - 1106
  • [48] Stroop interference, practice, and aging
    Davidson, DJ
    Zacks, RT
    Williams, CC
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2003, 10 (02) : 85 - 98
  • [49] Reverse Stroop interference effect
    de Weert, C. M. M.
    Snoeren, P. R.
    Puts, M. J. H.
    Pas, S. F. te
    PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 : 58 - 58
  • [50] Stroop interference in adults with dyslexia
    Proulx, Michael J.
    Elmasry, Hannah-May
    NEUROCASE, 2015, 21 (04) : 413 - 417