Comparative study of the functional, thermal and pasting properties of flours from different field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) cultivars

被引:120
|
作者
Kaur, Maninder [1 ]
Sandhu, Kawaljit Singh
Singh, Narpinder
机构
[1] Chaudhary Devi Lal Univ, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Sirsa, Haryana, India
[2] Guru Nanak Dev Univ, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Amritsar 143005, Punjab, India
关键词
flour; physicochemical; functional; thermal; pasting;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.037
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Physicochemical, functional, thermal and pasting properties of flours from field pea (LFP-48 and PG-3) and pigeon pea (AL-15 and AL-201) cultivars were determined and related to each other using Pearson correlation and principal component analysis (PCA). Field pea flours (FPF) were significantly (P < 0.05) different from pigeon pea flours (PPF) in their lower ash and higher fat and protein contents. FPF also exhibited higher L*, Delta E value, water solubility index (WSI), oil absorption capacity (OAC), foaming capacity (FC) and lower a*, b* value, water absorption index (WAI) and water absorption capacity (WAC) in comparison to PPF. FPF differed significantly from PPF in exhibiting lower transition temperatures (T-o, T-p, T-c), enthalpy of gelatinization (Delta H-gel), peak height index (PHI) and higher gelatinization temperature range (R). PCA showed that LFP-48 and PG-3 flours were located at the far left of the score plot with a large negative score, while the AL-15 and AL-201 flours had large positive scores in the first principal component. Several significant correlations between functional, thermal and pasting properties were revealed, both by Pearson correlation and PCA. Pasting properties of the flours, measured using the rapid visco analyzer (RVA), also differed significantly. PPF were observed to have higher pasting temperature (PT), peak viscosity (PV), trough viscosity (TV), breakdown (BV), final viscosity (FV) and lower setback viscosity (SV) as compared to FPF. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trypsin inhibitor activity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.)
    Wang, XF
    Warkentin, TD
    Briggs, CJ
    Oomah, BD
    Campbell, CG
    Woods, S
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (07) : 2620 - 2623
  • [22] Emulsifying and Foaming Properties of Commercial Yellow Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seed Flours
    Aluko, Rotimi E.
    Mofolasayo, Olawunmi A.
    Watts, Beverley A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (20) : 9793 - 9800
  • [23] Domestication of Pea (Pisum sativum L.): The Case of the Abyssinian Pea
    Weeden, Norman F.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [24] Study of tannin content on forage pigeon-pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp) germplasm
    Godoy, R
    Batista, LAR
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1997, 26 (03): : 443 - 446
  • [25] Differences in the growth stages of Erysiphe pisi on cultivars of field pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Su, H
    Hwang, SF
    Chang, KF
    Conner, RL
    Howard, RJ
    Turbull, GD
    Blade, SF
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2004, 111 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [26] CAPS markers for the identification of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars
    Konovalov, F. A.
    Toshchakova, E. V.
    Gostimsky, S. A.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2009, 45 (02) : 251 - 254
  • [27] CAPS markers for the identification of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars
    F. A. Konovalov
    E. V. Toshchakova
    S. A. Gostimsky
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2009, 45 : 251 - 254
  • [28] Comparative Study of Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L.) Protein Isolates and its Major Protein Fractions
    Fernandez Sosa, Eliana Isabel
    Chaves, Maria Guadalupe
    Quiroga, Alejandra Viviana
    Avanza, Maria Victoria
    PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 2021, 76 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [29] Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of starches from four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars
    Ratnayake, WS
    Hoover, R
    Shahidi, F
    Perera, C
    Jane, J
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2001, 74 (02) : 189 - 202
  • [30] Biofortification of pea (Pisum sativum L.): a review
    Guindon, Maria Fernanda
    Cazzola, Federico
    Palacios, Tatiana
    Gatti, Ileana
    Bermejo, Carolina
    Cointry, Enrique
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 101 (09) : 3551 - 3563