Machine learning models to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children

被引:7
|
作者
Hu, Jian [1 ]
Fung, France W. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Jacobwitz, Marin [3 ]
Parikh, Darshana S. [2 ,8 ]
Vala, Lisa [8 ]
Donnelly, Maureen [8 ]
Topjian, Alexis A. [2 ,6 ]
Abend, Nicholas S. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Xiao, Rui [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Neurol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Pediat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Neurodiagnost, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
Seizure; Pediatric; Electroencephalogram; EEG monitoring; Machine learning; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; CONTINUOUS VIDEO-EEG; ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURES; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; COMATOSE CHILDREN; ADULTS; COMMON; TERMINOLOGY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2021.03.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine whether machine learning techniques would enhance our ability to incorporate key variables into a parsimonious model with optimized prediction performance for electroencephalographic seizure (ES) prediction in critically ill children. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective observational cohort study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with encephalopathy who underwent clinically-indicated continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). We implemented and compared three state-of-the-art machine learning methods for ES prediction: (1) random forest; (2) Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO); and (3) Deep Learning Important FeaTures (DeepLIFT). We developed a ranking algorithm based on the relative importance of each variable derived from the machine learning methods. Results: Based on our ranking algorithm, the top five variables for ES prediction were: (1) epileptiform discharges in the initial 30 minutes, (2) clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, (3) sex, (4) age dichotomized at 1 year, and (5) epileptic encephalopathy. Compared to the stepwise selection-based approach in logistic regression, the top variables selected by our ranking algorithm were more informative as models utilizing the top variables achieved better prediction performance evaluated by prediction accuracy, AUROC and F1 score. Adding additional variables did not improve and sometimes worsened model performance. Conclusion: The ranking algorithm was helpful in deriving a parsimonious model for ES prediction with optimal performance. However, application of state-of-the-art machine learning models did not substantially improve model performance compared to prior logistic regression models. Thus, to further improve the ES prediction, we may need to collect more samples and variables that provide additional information.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Electrographic seizures and status epilepticus in critically ill children and neonates with encephalopathy
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Wusthoff, Courtney J.
    Goldberg, Ethan M.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (12): : 1170 - 1179
  • [32] Development, deployment, and continuous monitoring of a machine learning model to predict respiratory failure in critically ill patients
    Lam, Jonathan Y.
    Lu, Xiaolei
    Shashikumar, Supreeth P.
    Lee, Ye Sel
    Miller, Michael
    Pour, Hayden
    Boussina, Aaron E.
    Pearce, Alex K.
    Malhotra, Atul
    Nemati, Shamim
    JAMIA OPEN, 2024, 7 (04)
  • [33] Machine learning algorithm to predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease
    Li, Xunliang
    Zhu, Yuyu
    Zhao, Wenman
    Shi, Rui
    Wang, Zhijuan
    Pan, Haifeng
    Wang, Deguang
    RENAL FAILURE, 2023, 45 (01)
  • [34] Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Critically Ill Children: Frequency, Etiology and Outcomes
    Rajper, Sanam B.
    Moazzam, Mujtaba
    Zeeshan, Arsheen
    Abbas, Qalab
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROSCIENCES, 2020, 15 (04) : 375 - 378
  • [35] Modifiable Risk Factors in Critically Ill Children Moving Beyond Seizures
    Scott, Rod C.
    Wusthoff, Courtney J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (22) : 1019 - 1020
  • [36] Application of Machine Learning Models to Biomedical and Information System Signals From Critically Ill Adults
    Lilly, Craig M.
    Kirk, David
    Pessach, Itai M.
    Lotun, Gurudev
    Chen, Ofer
    Lipsky, Ari
    Lieder, Iris
    Celniker, Gershon
    Cucchi, Eric W.
    Blum, James M.
    CHEST, 2024, 165 (05) : 1139 - 1148
  • [37] Can Lactate Clearance Predict Mortality in Critically Ill Children?
    Moustafa, Azza A.
    Elhadidi, Abeer S.
    El-Nagar, Mona A.
    Hassouna, Hadir M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 12 (02) : 112 - 117
  • [38] Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill children
    Zhou, Jintuo
    Xie, Yongjin
    Liu, Ying
    Niu, Peiguang
    Chen, Huajiao
    Zeng, Xiaoping
    Zhang, Jinhua
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [39] Seizures and status epilepticus in the critically ill
    Mirski, Marek A.
    Varelas, Panaylotis N.
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2008, 24 (01) : 115 - +
  • [40] SUBCLINICAL SEIZURES IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Eliashiv, Dawn
    Tsimerinov, I.
    Pirrozi, A.
    Lin, T.
    Miller, C.
    Palestrant, D.
    Chung, J.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 427 - 427