Inferring evolutionary trees with strong combinatorial evidence

被引:51
|
作者
Berry, V
Gascuel, O
机构
[1] LIRMM, Dept Informat Fondamentale & Applicat, F-34392 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Warwick, Dept Comp Sci, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ St Etienne, EURISE, Dept Math, St Etienne, France
关键词
phylogeny reconstruction; quartet method; exact polynomial algorithm; partially resolved tree; combinatorial technique; worst-case convergence rate; experimental study;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3975(99)00235-2
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We consider the problem of inferring the evolutionary tree of a set of n species. We propose a quartet reconstruction method which specifically produces trees whose edges have strong combinatorial evidence. Let Q be a set of resolved quartets defined on the studied species, the method computes the unique maximum subset Q* of Q which is equivalent to a tree and outputs the corresponding tree as an estimate of the species' phylogeny. We use a characterization of the subset Q* due to Bandelt and Dress (Adv. Appl. Math. 7 (1986) 309-343) to provide an O(n(4)) incremental algorithm for this variant of the NP-hard quartet consistency problem. Moreover, when chosing the resolution of the quartets by the four-Point method (FPM) and considering the Cavender-Farris model of evolution, we show that the convergence rate of the Q* method is at worst polynomial when the maximum evolutive distance between two species is bounded. We complete these theoretical results by an experimental study on real and simulated data sets. The results show that (i) as expected, the strong combinatorial constraints it imposes on each edge leads the Q* method to propose very few incorrect edges; (ii) more surprisingly; the method infers trees with a relatively high degree of resolution. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 298
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Properties of Consensus Methods for Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees
    Degnan, James H.
    DeGiorgio, Michael
    Bryant, David
    Rosenberg, Noah A.
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2009, 58 (01) : 35 - 54
  • [32] INFERRING FROM EVIDENCE
    BROWN, R
    PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1957, 66 (03): : 389 - 393
  • [33] Inferring Protein-Protein Interactions by Combinatorial Models
    Zhang, Xiang-Sun
    Wang, Rui-Sheng
    Wu, Ling-Yun
    Zhang, Shi-Hua
    Cben, Luonan
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 : 183 - +
  • [34] NUMBER OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES
    FELSENSTEIN, J
    SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1978, 27 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [35] Evolutionary trees for all
    Penny, D
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2004, 19 (06) : 273 - 273
  • [36] ADDITIVE EVOLUTIONARY TREES
    WATERMAN, MS
    SMITH, TF
    SINGH, M
    BEYER, WA
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1977, 64 (02) : 199 - 213
  • [37] Understanding Evolutionary Trees
    Gregory T.R.
    Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2008, 1 (2) : 121 - 137
  • [38] USES FOR EVOLUTIONARY TREES
    FITCH, WM
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 349 (1327) : 93 - 102
  • [39] RELIABILITY OF EVOLUTIONARY TREES
    PENNY, D
    HENDY, MD
    HENDERSON, IM
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY, 1987, 52 : 857 - 862
  • [40] Beyond evolutionary trees
    Della Vedova, Gianluca
    Dondi, Riccardo
    Jiang, Tao
    Pavesi, Giulio
    Pirola, Yuri
    Wang, Lusheng
    NATURAL COMPUTING, 2010, 9 (02) : 421 - 435