Tensile Strength/Yield Strength (TS/YS) Ratios of High-Strength Steel (HSS) Reinforcing Bars

被引:8
|
作者
Tavio [1 ]
Anggraini, Retno [1 ,2 ]
Raka, I. Gede Putu [1 ]
Agustiar [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember ITS, Dept Civil Engn, Surabaya, Indonesia
[2] Brawijaya Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Malang, Indonesia
[3] Muhammadiyah Univ Aceh, Dept Civil Engn, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.5038318
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The building codes such as American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318M-14 and Standard National Indonesia (SNI) 2847:2013 require that the ratio of tensile strength (TS) and yield strength (YS) should not less than 1.25. The requirement is based on the assumption that a capability of a structural member to develop inelastic rotation capacity is a function of the length of the yield region. This paper reports an investigation on various steel grades, namely Grades 420, 550, 650, and 700 MPa, to examine the impact of different TS/YS ratios if it is less or greater than the required value. Grades 550, 650, and 700 MPa were purposely selected with the intention to examine if these higher grades are still promising to be implemented in special structural systems since they are prohibited by the building codes for longitudinal reinforcement, whereas Grade 420 MPa bars are the maximum limit of yield strength of reinforcing bars that is allowable for longitudinal reinforcement of special structural systems. Tensile tests of these steel samples were conducted under displacement controlled mode to capture the complete stress-strain curves and particularly the post-yield response of the steel bars. From the study, it can be concluded that Grade 420 performed higher TS/YS ratios and they were able to reach up to more than 1.25. However, the High Strength Still (HSS) bars (Grades 550, 600, and 700 MPa) resulted in lower TS/YS ratios (less than 1.25) compared with those of Grade 420 MPa.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Behavior of tension splices for reinforcing bars embedded in high-strength concrete
    Azizinamini, Atorod
    Transportation Research Record, 1998, (1624): : 125 - 131
  • [42] Behavior of tension splices for reinforcing bars embedded in high-strength concrete
    Azizinamini, A
    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN: BRIDGES, CULVERTS, AND PIPES, 1998, (1624): : 125 - 131
  • [43] BOND PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCING BARS EMBEDDED IN HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE - CLOSURE
    AZIZINAMINI, A
    STARK, M
    ROLLER, JJ
    GHOSH, SK
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 1994, 91 (04) : 500 - 501
  • [45] TENSION DEVELOPMENT LENGTH OF REINFORCING BARS EMBEDDED IN HIGH-STRENGTH CONCRETE
    AZIZINAMINI, A
    CHISALA, M
    GHOSH, SK
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1995, 17 (07) : 512 - 522
  • [46] EFFECT OF NICKEL ON YIELD STRENGTH OF HIGH-STRENGTH LOW-ALLOY STEEL
    LAPWOOD, DG
    PRESTON, RR
    METALS TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 5 (AUG): : 286 - 287
  • [47] Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete-filled square steel tube columns reinforced with ultrahigh-strength reinforcing bars
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Liu, Yujun
    Chen, Zeqiao
    Cai, Ruxing
    Li, Xiangyu
    STRUCTURES, 2021, 34 : 3125 - 3140
  • [48] Hysteretic behavior of high-strength concrete shear walls with high-strength steel bars: Experimental study and modelling
    Li, Xiangyu
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Cao, Wanlin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 214
  • [49] Comparasion of Impact and Tensile Properties of High-Strength Steel
    Alar, Zeljko
    Mandic, Davor
    METALS, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [50] Use of High-Strength Bars for the Seismic Performance of High-Strength Concrete Columns
    Ousalem, Hassane
    Takatsu, Hiroto
    Ishikawa, Yuji
    Kimura, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 7 (01) : 123 - 134