Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Zhang, Zhengchao [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Lele [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Zhijian [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yumin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Digest Syst Tumors Gansu Prov, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic; Laparoscopic; Bariatric surgery; Obesity; Meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with obesity by robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) compared with laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Methods The study was performed through searching in Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase database and Cochrane Library until March 31, 2020 comparing RBS with LBS. Data were calculated on the following endpoints: operative time, length of hospital stay, reoperation within 30 days, overall complications, leak, stricture, pulmonary embolisms, estimated blood loss and mortality. Data as relative risks (OR), or weighted mean difference (WMD) were summarized with 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of publication bias was assessed through standard methods. Results Thirty eligible trials including 7,239 robotic and 203,181 laparoscopic surgery cases showed that RBS was referred to attain longer operative time [WMD = 27.61 min; 95%CI (16.27-38.96); P < 0.01] and lower mortality [OR 2.40; 95% CI (1.24-4.64); P = 0.009] than LBS. Length of hospital stay [WMD = - 0.02; 95% CI (- 0.19-0.15); P = 0.819], reoperation within 30 days [OR 1.36; 95% CI (0.65-2.82); P = 0.411], overall complications [OR 0.88; 95% CI (0.68-1.15); P = 0.362], leak [OR 1.04; 95% CI (0.43-2.51); P = 0.933], stricture [OR 1.05; 95% CI (0.52-2.12); P = 0.895], pulmonary embolisms [OR 1.97; 95% CI (0.93-4.17); P = 0.075], estimated blood loss[WMD = - 1.93; 95% CI (- 4.61-0.75); P = 0.158] were almost similar in both RBS group and LBS group. Three was no statistically significant difference between RRYGB and LRYGB in EWL%, no statistical significance between RSG and LSG after 1 year, 2 years and 3 years. Conclusion RBS presented lower mortality within 90 days and longer operative time in this meta-analysis with similar safety and efficacy for the obesity compared with LBS in other outcomes. Additionally, RBS might be beneficial in the future if it would be evaluated in comprehensive and long-term endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:2440 / 2456
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Migraines: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dang, Jerry T.
    Lee, Jeremy K. H.
    Kung, Janice Y.
    Switzer, Noah J.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    Birch, Daniel W.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1061 - 1067
  • [22] Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bhogal, Sanjit K.
    Reddigan, Jacinta I.
    Rotstein, Ori D.
    Cohen, Ashley
    Glockler, Dresden
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Smylie, Janet K.
    Glazer, Stephen A.
    Pennington, Jason
    Conn, Lesley Gotlib
    Jackson, Timothy D.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (05) : 888 - 899
  • [23] The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mendes, Beatriz Ximenes
    Defante, Maria L. R.
    de Souza, Mariana de Moura
    Oliveira Filho, Joselio Rodrigues
    Morais, Beatriz A. De A. De Hollanda
    Prizao, Vitoria M.
    de Oliveira, Lilia Maria Lima
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2025, 35 (02) : 658 - 660
  • [24] Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buchwald, Henry
    Estok, Rhonda
    Fahrbach, Kyle
    Banel, Deirdre
    Sledge, Isabella
    SURGERY, 2007, 142 (04) : 621 - 632
  • [25] Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sanjit K. Bhogal
    Jacinta I. Reddigan
    Ori D. Rotstein
    Ashley Cohen
    Dresden Glockler
    Andrea C. Tricco
    Janet K. Smylie
    Stephen A. Glazer
    Jason Pennington
    Lesley Gotlib Conn
    Timothy D. Jackson
    Obesity Surgery, 2015, 25 : 888 - 899
  • [26] Bariatric Surgery and Brain Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    van Reekum, Emma
    Darcy, Michael
    Drage, Jaslyn
    Xu, Joshua
    Ng, Kimberly
    Forestell, Benjamin
    Santesso, Nancy
    Joundi, Raed
    Wong, Jorge
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Taylor, Valerie
    Yusuf, Salim
    Van Lieshout, Ryan
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 : 282 - 282
  • [27] Bariatric surgery and relevant comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Claire Wunker
    Sunjay Kumar
    Peter Hallowell
    Amelia Collings
    Lindsey Loss
    Varun Bansal
    Bradley Kushner
    Theofano Zoumpou
    Tammy Lyn Kindel
    D. Wayne Overby
    Julietta Chang
    Subhashini Ayloo
    Andrew F. Sabour
    Omar M. Ghanem
    Essa Aleassa
    Adam Reid
    Noe Rodriguez
    Ivy N. Haskins
    L. Renee Hilton
    Bethany J. Slater
    Francesco Palazzo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2025, 39 (3) : 1419 - 1448
  • [28] SURGERY FOR OBESITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Alobaid, H.
    Wells, G.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2014, 24 (08) : 1140 - 1140
  • [29] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes
    Leang, Yit J.
    Mayavel, Naveen
    Yang, Wilson T. W.
    Kong, Joseph C. H.
    Hensman, Chrys
    Burton, Paul R.
    Brown, Wendy A.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [30] The Safety and Necessity of Concomitant Cholecystectomy During Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xia, Congying
    Wang, Ming
    Lv, Hailong
    Li, Ming
    Jiang, Cuinan
    Liu, Zehan
    Yang, Qin
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (12) : 5418 - 5426