Differences in the Propensity of Different Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants to Be Disseminated via Transformation in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli

被引:2
|
作者
Hanafy, Zahra [1 ]
Osborne, Jason A. [2 ]
Miller, William G. [3 ]
Parker, Craig T. [3 ]
Olson, Jonathan W. [4 ]
Jackson, James H. [1 ]
Kathariou, Sophia [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Food Bioproc & Nutr Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] USDA, Produce Safety & Microbiol Res Unit, ARS, Albany, CA 94710 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国农业部; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; AMR; Campylobacter; transformation; NATURAL TRANSFORMATION; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; TRANSMISSION; ERYTHROMYCIN; PATHOGENS; TURKEYS;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms10061194
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are leading zoonotic foodborne pathogens, and the drugs of choice for human campylobacteriosis are macrolides (e.g., erythromycin) and fluoro-quinolones. C. jejuni and C. coli are naturally competent for transformation via naked DNA uptake, but potential differences in transformation frequency (TF) for different antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers remain poorly understood. We determined TFs for resistance to different antibiotics using as recipient a derivative of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (strain SN:CM) with donor DNA from multidrug-resistant C. jejuni or C. coli. TF for nalidixic acid resistance ranked significantly highest (similar to 1.4 x 10(-3)), followed by resistance to streptomycin and gentamicin. Tetracycline resistance via chromosomal tet(O) was less commonly transferred (similar to 7.6 x 10(-7)), while transformation to erythromycin resistance was rare (<= 4.7 x 10(-8)). We also determined TFs with the contemporary poultry-derived strains C. jejuni FSIS 11810577 and C. coli FSIS 1710488 as recipients. TFs to nalidixic acid and streptomycin resistance remained the highest (similar to 7 x 10(-4)). However, TF for gentamicin resistance was remarkably low in certain recipient-donor combinations, while average TF for erythromycin resistance was noticeably higher (similar to 3 x 10(-6) ) than with SN:CM. Findings from this experimental model provide insights into factors that may impact transformation-mediated transfer of AMR leading to AMR dissemination in the agricultural ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antimicrobial Resistance and Genomic Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from Retail Chickens in Beijing, China
    Bai, Yao
    Ma, Jiaqi
    Li, Fengqin
    Yang, Baowei
    Ren, Xiu
    Wang, Yeru
    Hu, Yujie
    Dong, Yinping
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Shaofei
    Cui, Shenghui
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [32] Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from domestic animals from Southern Ecuador
    Toledo, Zorayda
    Janneth Simaluiza, Rosa
    Fernandez, Heriberto
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2018, 48 (11):
  • [33] Genotypic characterization, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence determinants of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from pastured poultry farms
    Awad, Amal
    Yeh, Hung-Yueh
    Ramadan, Hazem
    Rothrock, Michael J.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [34] Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from Cattle between 2002 and 2006 in France
    Chatre, Pierre
    Haenni, Marisa
    Meunier, Daniele
    Botrel, Marie-Anne
    Calavas, Didier
    Madec, Jean-Yves
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2010, 73 (05) : 825 - 831
  • [35] Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli
    Wagley, Sariqa
    Newcombe, Jane
    Laing, Emma
    Yusuf, Emmanuel
    Sambles, Christine M.
    Studholme, David J.
    La Ragione, Roberto M.
    Titball, Richard W.
    Champion, Olivia L.
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [36] Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli
    Sariqa Wagley
    Jane Newcombe
    Emma Laing
    Emmanuel Yusuf
    Christine M Sambles
    David J Studholme
    Roberto M La Ragione
    Richard W Titball
    Olivia L Champion
    BMC Microbiology, 14
  • [37] Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli:: Molecular mechanism and stability of the resistance phenotype
    Gibreel, A
    Kos, VN
    Keelan, M
    Trieber, CA
    Levesque, S
    Michaud, S
    Taylor, DE
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (07) : 2753 - 2759
  • [38] Roles of lipooligosaccharide and capsular polysaccharide in antimicrobial resistance and natural transformation of Campylobacter jejuni
    Jeon, Byeonghwa
    Muraoka, Wayne
    Scupham, Alexandra
    Zhang, Qijing
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 63 (03) : 462 - 468
  • [39] QUINOLONE RESISTANCE IN CLINICAL STRAINS OF CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI AND CAMPYLOBACTER-COLI
    HARNETT, N
    MCLEOD, S
    YONG, YA
    HEWITT, C
    VEARNCOMBE, M
    KRISHNAN, C
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 36 (01) : 269 - 270
  • [40] Norfloxacin resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from Swedish patients
    Sjogren, E
    Lindblom, GB
    Kaijser, B
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 40 (02) : 257 - 261