Experimental validation of molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers:: A new approach

被引:147
|
作者
Benz, RW
Castro-Román, F
Tobias, DJ [1 ]
White, SH
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.104.046821
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
A novel protocol has been developed for comparing the structural properties of lipid bilayers determined by simulation with those determined by diffraction experiments, which makes it possible to test critically the ability of molecular dynamics simulations to reproduce experimental data. This model-independent method consists of analyzing data from molecular dynamics bilayer simulations in the same way as experimental data by determining the structure factors of the system and, via Fourier reconstruction, the overall transbilayer scattering-density profiles. Multi-nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of a dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer at 66% RH (5.4 waters/lipid) were performed in the constant pressure and temperature ensemble using the united-atom GROMACS and the all-atom CHARMM22/27 force fields with the GROMACS and NAMD software packages, respectively. The quality of the simulated bilayer structures was evaluated by comparing simulation with experimental results for bilayer thickness, area/lipid, individual molecular-component distributions, continuous and discrete structure factors, and overall scattering-density profiles. Neither the GROMACS nor the CHARMM22/27 simulations reproduced experimental data within experimental error. The widths of the simulated terminal methyl distributions showed a particularly strong disagreement with the experimentally observed distributions. A comparison of the older CHARMM22 with the newer CHARMM27 force fields shows that significant progress is being made in the development of atomic force fields for describing lipid bilayer systems empirically.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 817
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS AND MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS OF LIPID BILAYERS
    PASTOR, RW
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 4 (04) : 486 - 492
  • [22] PARALLEL MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS - METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS TO LIPID BILAYERS
    VINCENT, JJ
    DAMODARAN, KV
    MERZ, KM
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 208 : 38 - COMP
  • [23] Naratriptan aggregation in lipid bilayers: perspectives from molecular dynamics simulations
    Irene Wood
    Mónica Pickholz
    Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2016, 22
  • [24] Refining the structure of lipid bilayers with insight from molecular dynamics simulations
    Klauda, JB
    Pastor, RW
    Kucerka, N
    Brooks, BR
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U1391 - U1391
  • [25] Ultra coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers
    Carrillo, Jan Michael
    Katsaras, John
    Sumpter, Bobby
    Ashkar, Rana
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [26] Constant surface tension molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers with trehalose
    Venable, R. M.
    Skibinsky, A.
    Pastor, R. W.
    MOLECULAR SIMULATION, 2006, 32 (10-11) : 849 - 855
  • [27] Solvent-free molecular dynamics simulations of supported lipid bilayers
    Hoopes, Matthew I.
    Longo, Marjorie M.
    Faller, Roland
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, : 547A - 547A
  • [28] Molecular dynamics simulations of the interactions of cationic antimicrobial peptides with lipid bilayers
    Kandasamy, SK
    Larson, RG
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 86 (01) : 41A - 41A
  • [29] Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Lipid-Linked Oligosaccharide in Membrane Bilayers
    Kern, Nathan
    Wu, Emilia L.
    Jo, Sunhwan
    Vanommeslaeghe, Kenno
    Im, Wonpil
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 104 (02) : 83A - 83A
  • [30] Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Propofol and Fentanyl in Phosphatidylcholine Lipid Bilayers
    Faulkner, Christopher
    Santos-Carballal, David
    Plant, David F.
    de Leeuw, Nora H.
    ACS OMEGA, 2020, 5 (24): : 14340 - 14353