Development of a self-reported version of the G8 screening tool

被引:21
|
作者
van Walree, Inez Charlotte [1 ]
Vondeling, Ariel M. [1 ]
Vink, Geraldine R. [2 ,8 ]
van Huis-Tanja, Lieke H. [3 ]
Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H. [4 ]
Bellera, Carine [5 ,9 ]
Soubeyran, Pierre [6 ,7 ]
Hamaker, Marije E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Dept Internal Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Geriatr Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] INSERM, Ctr INSERM U1219, ISPED, Bordeaux Populat Hlth Ctr,Epicene Team Canc & Env, Bordeaux, France
[6] Inst Bergonie, Dept Med Oncol, Bordeaux, France
[7] Bordeaux Univ, Bordeaux, France
[8] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Reg Comprehens Canc Ctr, Inst Bergonie, Clin Res & Clin Epidemiol Unit, Bordeaux, France
关键词
OLDER CANCER-PATIENTS; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The G8 is a widely used frailty screening tool in patients with cancer that was designed to be completed by healthcare professionals. A patient-reported version would enable a broader application. Aim of this study was to develop a self-reported version of the G8 and to assess its agreement with the original G8. Materials and Methods: A self-reported version of the G8 was developed with the aid of communication specialists. Patients aged >= 70 years from two different study populations were included: 1. Patients with cancer and 2. Patients visiting the geriatric outpatient clinic. The original G8 was completed by an oncology nurse or clinical research assistant and patients completed the self-reported G8. Patients were blinded to results of the original G8. Kappas were calculated to measure the agreement between the self-reported and original G8 for both the individual items as well as for the cut-off for potential frailty (<= 14). Results: 161 patients participated, of whom 104 had cancer (65%). Patients with cancer more frequently completed all items than geriatric patients (all items completed in 94% versus 72%, p < 0.001). The agreement for potential frailty was substantial for patients with cancer (Kappa 0.63) and poor for geriatric patients (Kappa 0.05). Conclusion: Completion of the self-reported G8 is feasible and agreement of its outcome with the original G8 outcome is sufficient for patients with cancer but not for geriatric patients. The self-reported G8 may therefore be a useful alternative to the original G8 in older patients with cancer. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 930
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision-making process in older breast cancer patients
    Scheepers, Ellen R. M.
    van der Molen, Loes F.
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    Burgmans, Josephine P.
    van Huis-Tanja, Lieke H.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (01)
  • [42] PREDICTIVE VALUE OF G8 SCREENING TOOL IN ELDERLY POPULATION UNDERGOING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: PRELIMINARY EVALUATION
    Boschian, Riccardo
    Pavan, Nicola
    Verzotti, Enrica
    Silvestri, Tommaso
    Traunero, Fabio
    Liguori, Giovanni
    Trombetta, Carlo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (04) : 2542 - 2542
  • [43] Race and the validity of self-reported cancer screening behaviors: Development of a conceptual model
    Burgess, Diana J.
    Powell, Adam A.
    Griffin, Joan M.
    Partin, Melissa R.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 48 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [44] Self-reported musculoskeletal disorders questionnaire for agriculturists: An online self-assessment tool development
    Poochada, Worawan
    Chailklieng, Sunisa
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [45] Evaluation of Elderly Patients with Hematological Malignancies By Two Different Geriatric Risk Scoring Systems: G8 and Flemish Version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST)
    Atilla, Erden
    Yalciner, Merih
    Kilic, Ozlem
    Muftuoglu, Nurhayat
    Atilla, Pinar Ataca
    Bozdag, Sinem Civriz
    Toprak, Selami Kocak
    Yuksel, Meltem Kurt
    Ozcan, Muhit
    Gurman, Gunhan
    Ilhan, Osman
    BLOOD, 2018, 132
  • [46] Introduction of a G8 screening programme for older cancer patients
    Hannan, M.
    Hennessy, M.
    Walsh, D.
    Scally, S.
    Tabb, E.
    Dunne, E.
    O'Connor, M.
    Calvert, P.
    Jordan, E.
    Horgan, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1248 - S1248
  • [47] Korean version of the G-8 geriatric screening tool: Translation and linguistic validation
    Yuk, Hyeong Dong
    Kim, Julia Jooyoung
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (03) : 470 - 474
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of the geriatric screening tools G8 and modified G8 in older patients with lung cancer: A diagnostic performance study
    Bech, Danny
    Lietzen, Lone Winther
    Meldgaard, Peter
    Ryltoft, Anne-Kathrine
    Orum, Marianne
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [49] Feasibility of implementing the G8 screening tool in geriatric patients in oncology clinics across multiple institutions.
    Haq, Rashida
    Wong, Camilla
    Gulasingam, Pauline
    Kong, Amy
    Ahmed, Youmna
    Rosenberg, Jarred
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [50] Health and development: How are the G7/G8 doing?
    Labonte, R
    Sanders, D
    Schrecker, T
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2002, 56 (05) : 322 - 322