Bayesian decision making of maintenance strategy selection in offshore sectors

被引:0
|
作者
Yazdi, Mohammad [1 ]
Golilarz, Noorbakhsh Amiri [2 ]
Nedjati, Arman [3 ]
Adesina, Kehinde A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Elect Comp & Biomed Engn, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[3] Quchan Univ Technol, Ind Engn Dept, Quchan, Iran
[4] Near East Univ, Ind Engn Dept, Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
来源
RESEARCH IN MARINE SCIENCES | 2021年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
Bayesian network; Decision making; MCDM methods; Crane; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MODIFIED TOPSIS; DEMATEL METHOD; FAILURE MODE; FUZZY AHP; UNCERTAINTY; FRAMEWORK; SAFETY; SUSTAINABILITY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Decision making in general is a challenging task in offshore and marine industrial sectors. That is why, calling a reliable method to make a decision is vital such areas. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools have been widely utilized this fields. However, MCDM methods are deeply suffering from couple of shortages, such as but not limited to the final output is totally depending on qualitative terms, data and model uncertainties are not handled, confidence level of decision is ignored, and it is not considered the factor time into the final decision. In order to deal with the aforementioned shortages, the fuzzy Bayesian structural method as a reliable and powerful tool can be used. The maintenance strategy selection in offshore sectors is utilized as an application of study show the effectiveness of Bayesian structural method. The results also compared with different type of MCDM methods, which showing that Bayesian structural method has high merits over conventional decision-making tools.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 950
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Prognostic Modelling to Inform Maintenance Decision Making
    McNaught, K. R.
    Zagorecki, A.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 1155 - 1159
  • [22] Learning and strategy selection in multi-attribute decision making
    Arndt, Broeder
    Tilmann, Betsch
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 547 - 547
  • [23] A Decision-making Model for Corrective Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines Considering Uncertainties
    Nachimuthu, Sathishkumar
    Zuo, Ming J.
    Ding, Yi
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (08):
  • [24] Investigating key decision problems to optimize the operation and maintenance strategy of offshore wind farms
    Sperstad, Iver Bakken
    McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy
    Kolstad, Magne
    Sjolnark, Severin
    13TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, EERA DEEPWIND'2016, 2016, 94 : 261 - 268
  • [25] IMPROVED AHP-GROUP DECISION MAKING FOR INVESTMENT STRATEGY SELECTION
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Ergu, Daji
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2012, 18 (02) : 299 - 316
  • [26] Learning to Choose: Cognitive Aging and Strategy Selection Learning in Decision Making
    Mata, Rui
    von Helversen, Bettina
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (02) : 299 - 309
  • [27] Some Metatheoretical Reflections on Adaptive Decision Making and the Strategy Selection Problem
    Marewski, Julian N.
    Broeder, Arndt
    Gloeckner, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2018, 31 (02) : 181 - 198
  • [28] Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making
    Pachur, Thorsten
    Olsson, Henrik
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (02) : 207 - 240
  • [29] Selection strategy of uniform expert evaluation scale in group decision making
    Zhao, Meng
    Wang, Yajun
    Meng, Xinyu
    Gou, Xunjie
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2024, 75 (06) : 1178 - 1192
  • [30] A Hybrid Fuzzy Group Decision Making and Factor Analysis for Selecting Maintenance Strategy
    Mousavi, S. S.
    Nezami, F. G.
    Heydar, M.
    Aryanejad, M. B.
    CIE: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 1204 - +