Anatomical projection of the cervical uncinate process in ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery

被引:22
|
作者
Ugur, HÇ
Uz, A
Attar, A
Tekdemir, I
Egemen, N
Elhan, A
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anat, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
cervical spine; discectomy; decompression; uncinate process; vertebral artery;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0248
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The cervical uncinate processes (UPs), their variations, and the relationships between the neurovascular structures and surrounding bone were investigated in this anatomical study. The object of this study was to highlight the important surgery-related considerations associated with ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery. Methods. Forty-nine adult C3-7 dry bone samples were used, and 10 measurements were obtained for each vertebra. The anterior measurements involved the cervical uncinate process (UP): height, width, length, distance between its tip and vertebral foramina, interuncinate process distance, sagittal angle with the superior margin of the vertebral body (VB), VB anteroposterior diameter, and VB width. Posterior measurements involved the vertical distance between the superior border of the lamina at the lamina-facet joint and the tip of the UP, as well as the horizontal distance between the medial-most border of the superior facet and the tip of the UP. All symmetrical structures were measured bilaterally. There were no statistically significant differences between right- and left-sided measurements in this series. The height of the UP increased gradually at each segmental level between C-3 and C-7. The width of the UP did not change with segmental level (5.0 mm at C-3 compared with 5.3 mm at C-7). On average, the length of the UP was relatively constant. The distance from the tip of the UP to vertebral foramina averaged 1 mm at the C2-3 level and 1.5 mm at the C5-6 level. Interuncinate distance and VB width gradually increased and were highly variable, which appeared to be related with osteophyte formation. There was a slight gradual increase from C-3 to lower segments, and it paralleled with the midline anteroposterior diameter of the same VB. The angle between the UP and the superior margin of the VB exhibited great variety. The posterior measurements decreased gradually from C-3 to C-7. Conclusions. Based on the data obtained in this study, a surgeon is provided with a three-dimensional orientation as well as anatomical knowledge. This knowledge also allows for a more effective neurovascular decompression by minimizing the surgery-related complications.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 251
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] Clinical outcomes and risk factors in patients with cervical metastatic spinal cord compression after posterior decompressive and spinal stabilization surgery
    Lei, Mingxing
    Yu, Jun
    Yan, Shiju
    An, Xiao
    Liu, Yaosheng
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 119 - 127
  • [12] Multidirectional Flexibility of the Spine Following Posterior Decompressive Surgery After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty An In Vitro Biomechanical Investigation
    Kikkawa, Jun
    Cunningham, Bryan W.
    Shirado, Osamu
    Hu, Nianbin
    McAfee, Paul C.
    Oda, Hiromi
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (25) : E1465 - E1471
  • [13] Dorsal versus ventral surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: considerations for approach selection and review of surgical outcomes
    Shin, John H.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Krishnaney, Ajit A.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2011, 30 (03)
  • [14] Inter-spinous process distance: a novel parameter predicting segmental lordosis during posterior cervical spine deformity surgery
    Takayoshi Shimizu
    Suthipas Pongmanee
    K. Daniel Riew
    European Spine Journal, 2019, 28 : 1192 - 1199
  • [15] Inter-spinous process distance: a novel parameter predicting segmental lordosis during posterior cervical spine deformity surgery
    Shimizu, Takayoshi
    Pongmanee, Suthipas
    Riew, K. Daniel
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (05) : 1192 - 1199