A prospective doubleblind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder

被引:28
|
作者
Cho, C-H [1 ]
Min, B-W [1 ]
Bae, K-C [1 ]
Lee, K-J [1 ]
Kim, D. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Daegu, South Korea
来源
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL | 2021年 / 103B卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; STEROID INJECTION; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; SITES;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Ultrasound (US)-guided injections are widely used in patients with conditions of the shoulder in order to improve their accuracy. However, the clinical efficacy of US-guided injections compared with blind injections remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and efficacy of US-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint in patients with primary frozen shoulder (FS). Methods Intra-articular corticosteroid injections were administered to 90 patients primary FS, who were randomly assigned to either an US-guided (n = 45) or a blind technique (n = 45), by a shoulder specialist. Immediately after injection, fluoroscopic images were obtained to assess the accuracy of the injection. The outcome was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and range of movement (ROM) for all patients at the time of presentation and at three, six, and 12 weeks after injection. Results The accuracy of injection in the US and blind groups was 100% (45/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively; this difference was significant (p < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvements in VAS pain score, ASES score, SSV, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation throughout follow-up until 12 weeks after injection (all p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the VAS pain scores, the ASES score, the SSV and all ROMs between the two groups at the time points assessed (all p > 0.05). No injection-related adverse effects were noted in either group. Conclusion We found no significant differences in pain and functional outcomes between the two groups, although an US-guided injection was associated with greater accuracy. Considering that it is both costly and time-consuming, an US-guided intra-articular injection of corticosteroid seems not always to be necessary in the treatment of FS as it gives similar outcomes as a blind injection.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison Between NSAID and Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injection in Frozen Shoulder of Diabetic Patients; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Dehghan, A.
    Pishgooei, N.
    Salami, M. -A.
    Zarch, S. M. M.
    Nafisi-moghadam, R.
    Rahimpour, S.
    Soleimani, H.
    Owlia, M. B.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2013, 121 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [22] The effectiveness of intra-articular vs subacromial corticosteroid injection for frozen shoulder Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Yanbiao
    Gong, Jing
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (16) : E19706
  • [23] Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Intra-articular Hip Injections Performed in the Orthopedic Clinic
    Balog, Todd P.
    Rhodehouse, Blair B.
    Turner, Eric K.
    Slevin, John M.
    Bush, Lisabeth A.
    Grassbaugh, Jason A.
    Marchant, Bryant G.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (02) : 96 - 100
  • [24] USEFULNESS OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTRA-ARTICULAR CARPAL INJECTIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS
    Arguello, Juan
    Santiago, L.
    Troitino, C.
    Najera, H.
    Mamani, M.
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 26 : 52 - 53
  • [25] The PRECISION Survey: Preferences of Physicians Regarding Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Injections
    Ekhtiari, Seper
    Horner, Nolan S.
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2020, 30 (04): : 372 - 377
  • [26] Effectiveness of Shock Wave Therapy versus Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection in Diabetic Frozen Shoulder Patients' Management: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elerian, Ahmed Ebrahim
    Rodriguez-Sanz, David
    Abdelaziz Elsherif, Abdelaziz
    Dorgham, Hend Adel
    Al-Hamaky, Dina Mohamed Ali
    El Fakharany, Mahmoud S.
    Ewidea, Mahmoud
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [27] Ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis and intra-articular injection of the hip and shoulder joints in the dog
    Miller, Allison
    Jennings, Carol
    Frye, Christopher
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 262 (10):
  • [28] Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Sacroiliac Joint Intra-articular Injections in the Noninflammatory Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded Study
    Jee, Haemi
    Lee, Ji-Hae
    Park, Ki Deok
    Ahn, Jaeki
    Park, Yongbum
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (02): : 330 - 337
  • [29] Similar short-term outcomes of ultrasound guided posterior intra-articular and anterior extra-articular corticosteroid injection in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. A randomized controlled, single-blind study
    Sensoz, Ersin
    Sevim, Omer Faruk
    Cakmak, Hayrettin
    Ediz, Suna Sahin
    Eceviz, Engin
    Ergun, Selim
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2024, 58 (04) : 223 - 228
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of point-of-care ultrasound-guided intra-articular corticosteroid joint injections in patients with haemophilic arthropathy
    Martin, E. J.
    Cooke, E. J.
    Ceponis, A.
    Barnes, R. F. W.
    Moran, C. M.
    Holle, S.
    Hughes, T. H.
    Moore, R. E.
    von Drygalski, A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2017, 23 (01) : 135 - 143