Comparison of microbiome samples: methods and computational challenges

被引:15
|
作者
Comin, Matteo [1 ]
Di Camillo, Barbara [1 ]
Pizzi, Cinzia [1 ]
Vandin, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Informat Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
microbiome; metagenomics; next-generation sequencing; BINNING ALGORITHM; METAGENOMIC SEQUENCES; ROBUST NORMALIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; GENOME;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbaa121
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The study of microbial communities crucially relies on the comparison of metagenomic next-generation sequencing data sets, for which several methods have been designed in recent years. Here, we review three key challenges in the comparison of such data sets: species identification and quantification, the efficient computation of distances between metagenomic samples and the identification of metagenomic features associated with a phenotype such as disease status. We present current solutions for such challenges, considering both reference-based methods relying on a database of reference genomes and reference-free methods working directly on all sequencing reads from the samples.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computational Chemistry: The Fate of Current Methods and Future Challenges
    Grimme, Stefan
    Schreiner, Peter R.
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2018, 57 (16) : 4170 - 4176
  • [32] Methods and Challenges for Computational Data Analysis for DNA Adductomics
    Walmsley, Scott J.
    Guo, Jingshu
    Wang, Jinhua
    Villalta, Peter W.
    Turesky, Robert J.
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 32 (11) : 2156 - 2168
  • [33] Nurse Burnout Revisited: A Comparison of Computational Methods
    Dutra, Herica Silva
    Guirardello, Edineis de Brito
    Li, Yin
    Cimiotti, Jeannie P.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2019, 27 (01) : E17 - E33
  • [34] A Comparison of Computational Methods for Identifying Virulence Factors
    Zheng, Lu-Lu
    Li, Yi-Xue
    Ding, Juan
    Guo, Xiao-Kui
    Feng, Kai-Yan
    Wang, Ya-Jun
    Hu, Le-Le
    Cai, Yu-Dong
    Hao, Pei
    Chou, Kuo-Chen
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [35] A comparison of the computational complexities of the stride reduction methods
    Evans, DJ
    AlWali, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 1996, 61 (3-4) : 307 - 320
  • [36] Comparison of Computational Methods of Associated Legendre Functions
    Enomoto, Takeshi
    SOLA, 2015, 11 : 144 - 149
  • [37] Comparison of Computational Methods for Simulating Depolymerization Reaction
    Mieda, Shunsuke
    ACS OMEGA, 2025, 10 (06): : 5973 - 5980
  • [38] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING REFLECTANCE OF FLUORESCENT SAMPLES
    ALMAN, DH
    BILLMEYER, FW
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1973, 63 (10) : 1279 - 1280
  • [39] Comparison of several methods for classification of gas samples
    Hornisova, K.
    Measurement 2007: 6th International Conference on Measurement, Proceedings, 2007, : 65 - 68
  • [40] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR TREATMENT PHYTOPLANKTON SAMPLES
    RATKOVA, TN
    BELJAEVA, TV
    OKEANOLOGIYA, 1984, 24 (06): : 1018 - 1021