This paper deals with the linguistic means used to express predicative possession in the languages of the Circum-Baltic area. The domain of possession is considered here as a prototypically organized domain, where the prototype is the notion of ownership. It is shown that most languages of the area do not provide evidence of splits in their possession systems: rather, they extend the scope of use of their ownership constructions to include all other non-prototypical possessive notions. The linguistic expression of notions that belong to domains neighboring possession, namely experience, location and attribution, is also analyzed. The results show that these notions are rarely coded by means of possessive constructions: exceptions are explained by invoking semantic causes as well as language contact. A comparison of the functions fulfilled by "have"-verbs in the Indo-European languages of the area and by adessive constructions in the Finnic languages is provided, too, and their different scopes of use are explained with reference to their diachronic development and to processes of areal convergence.
机构:
Tomsk State Pedag Univ, Ul Kievskaya 60, Tomsk 634061, Russia
Natl Res Tomsk Polytech Univ, Pr Lenina 30, Tomsk 634050, RussiaTomsk State Pedag Univ, Ul Kievskaya 60, Tomsk 634061, Russia
Lemskaya, V. M.
TOMSKII ZHURNAL LINGVISTICHESKIKH I ANTROPOLOGICHESKIKH ISSLEDOVANII-TOMSK JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS AND ANTHROPOLOGY,
2016,
(04):
: 37
-
42
机构:
Univ Arizona, 102 Learning Serv Bldg,1512 E First St, Tucson, AZ 85721 USAUniv Arizona, 102 Learning Serv Bldg,1512 E First St, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA