Early Auditory Evoked Potential Is Modulated by Selective Attention and Related to Individual Differences in Visual Working Memory Capacity

被引:37
|
作者
Giuliano, Ryan J. [1 ]
Karns, Christina M. [1 ]
Neville, Helen J. [1 ]
Hillyard, Steven A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; BRAIN POTENTIALS; COMPONENT; CHILDREN; FEATURES; STORAGE; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00684
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A growing body of research suggests that the predictive power of working memory (WM) capacity for measures of intellectual aptitude is due to the ability to control attention and select relevant information. Crucially, attentional mechanisms implicated in controlling access to WM are assumed to be domain-general, yet reports of enhanced attentional abilities in individuals with larger WM capacities are primarily within the visual domain. Here, we directly test the link between WM capacity and early attentional gating across sensory domains, hypothesizing that measures of visual WM capacity should predict an individual's capacity to allocate auditory selective attention. To address this question, auditory ERPs were recorded in a linguistic dichotic listening task, and individual differences in ERP modulations by attention were correlated with estimates of WM capacity obtained in a separate visual change detection task. Auditory selective attention enhanced ERP amplitudes at an early latency (ca. 70-90 msec), with larger P1 components elicited by linguistic probes embedded in an attended narrative. Moreover, this effect was associated with greater individual estimates of visual WM capacity. These findings support the view that domain-general attentional control mechanisms underlie the wide variation of WM capacity across individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2682 / 2690
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction
    Broadway, James M.
    Engle, Randall W.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2011, 137 (01) : 115 - 126
  • [42] Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention
    Kotyusov, Alexander I.
    Kasanov, Dauren
    Kosachenko, Alexandra I.
    Gashkova, Anastasia S.
    Pavlov, Yuri G.
    Malykh, Sergey
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [43] Individual Differences in Attention Capture, Control, and Working Memory
    Garner, Lauren D.
    Robison, Matthew K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2025, 51 (02) : 243 - 259
  • [44] Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity
    Nagaraj, Naveen K.
    Magimairaj, Beula M.
    Schwartz, Sarah
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (07) : 3581 - 3593
  • [45] Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity
    Naveen K. Nagaraj
    Beula M. Magimairaj
    Sarah Schwartz
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 3581 - 3593
  • [46] EVOKED-POTENTIAL CORRELATES OF VISUAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION
    WASTELL, DG
    KLEINMAN, D
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1980, 46 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [47] Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Shooting Behavior
    Brewer, Gene A.
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Ware, Jillian M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 5 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [48] Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Attentional Control
    Hiebel, Nina
    Zimmer, Hubert D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2015, 69 (01): : 17 - 27
  • [49] Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency
    Miller, Ashley L.
    Unsworth, Nash
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2018, 46 (07) : 1149 - 1163
  • [50] Working Memory Capacity and Categorization: Individual Differences and Modeling
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (03) : 720 - 738