Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance?

被引:96
|
作者
Langer, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Decker, Thomas [2 ]
Menrad, Klaus [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Mkt & Consumer Res, Alte Akad 16, D-85350 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Weihenstephan Triesdorf, Straubing Ctr Sci, Chair Mkt & Management Biogen Resources, Petersgasse 18, D-94315 Straubing, Germany
关键词
Choice experiment; Acceptance; Wind energy; Citizen participation; Germany; Citizen preference; COMMUNITY RENEWABLE ENERGY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; POWER; INVESTMENT; FRAMEWORK; ATTITUDES; CONJOINT; INFRASTRUCTURE; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is widely recognized that social aspects play an important role in the implementation of wind energy projects. The energy transition in Germany can only succeed if the needs and expectations of local citizens are taken into account. Previous research has shown that public participation fosters the acceptance of wind energy by citizens. This study explores which form of participation citizens prefer with respect to wind energy projects. Opportunities for participation range from no participation, alibi participation, information, consultation, cooperation and financial participation. We used a hypothetical choice experiment in which people are asked to choose between different wind energy projects that were described by a number of attributes. The results show that the most important factors influencing the acceptance of wind energy projects are the sound level at the place of residence, the distance of the turbines to the place of residence and participation opportunities. With regard to participation, respondents prefer information over financial participation. The results suggest that citizens should be involved in informative and deliberative participation processes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 73
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sri Lankan case study on public/private participation in the promotion of wind energy
    Robinson, Rod
    Thanthilage, Rohitha
    RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION, 2007, 941 : 242 - +
  • [32] Public Acceptance of Offshore Wind Power Projects in the USA
    Firestone, Jeremy
    Kempton, Willett
    Krueger, Andrew
    WIND ENERGY, 2009, 12 (02) : 183 - 202
  • [33] VALUE TO PRISONERS OF PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC-SERVICE PROJECTS
    FULLER, G
    FEDERAL PROBATION, 1956, 20 (04) : 52 - 54
  • [34] Public participation in designing a recycling scheme towards maximum public acceptance
    Keramitsoglou, Kiriaki M.
    Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2013, 70 : 55 - 67
  • [35] Public participation in mission-oriented innovation projects
    Wiarda, Martijn
    Sobota, Vladimir C. M.
    Janssen, Matthijs J.
    de Kaa, Geerten van
    Yaghmaei, Emad
    Doorn, Neelke
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 191
  • [36] Acceptance of wind energy and the role of financial and procedural participation: An investigation with focus groups and choice experiments
    Lienhoop, Nele
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 118 : 97 - 105
  • [37] Testing the value of public participation in Germany: Theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation
    Schroeter, Regina
    Scheel, Oliver
    Renn, Ortwin
    Schweizer, Pia-Johanna
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 : 116 - 125
  • [38] Price or public participation? Community benefits for onshore wind in Ireland, Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom
    le Maitre, Julia
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2024, 114
  • [39] The Role of Public Participation in Energy Transitions
    Smardon, Richard C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (01) : 155 - 156
  • [40] Wind energy in the city: An interurban comparison of social acceptance of wind energy projects
    Khorsand, Iman
    Kormos, Christine
    MacDonald, Erin G.
    Crawford, Curran
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 : 66 - 77