共 50 条
Artificial Intelligence to Identify Arthroplasty Implants From Radiographs of the Hip
被引:51
|作者:
Karnuta, Jaret M.
[1
]
Haeberle, Heather S.
[1
,2
]
Luu, Bryan C.
[1
,3
]
Roth, Alexander L.
[1
]
Molloy, Robert M.
[1
]
Nystrom, Lukas M.
[1
]
Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
[1
]
Schaffer, Jonathan L.
[1
]
Chen, Antonia F.
[4
]
Iorio, Richard
[4
]
Krebs, Viktor E.
[1
]
Ramkumar, Prem N.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Cleveland Clin, Orthopaed Machine Learning Lab, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源:
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
|
2021年
/
36卷
/
07期
关键词:
total hip arthroplasty;
revision arthroplasty;
machine learning;
implant identification;
artificial intelligence;
TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY;
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;
PROJECTIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.015
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: The surgical management of complications surrounding patients who have undergone hip arthroplasty necessitates accurate identification of the femoral implant manufacturer and model. Failure to do so risks delays in care, increased morbidity, and further economic burden. Because few arthroplasty experts can confidently classify implants using plain radiographs, automated image processing using deep learning for implant identification may offer an opportunity to improve the value of care rendered. Methods: We trained, validated, and externally tested a deep-learning system to classify total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty femoral implants as one of 18 different manufacturer models from 1972 retrospectively collected anterior-posterior (AP) plain radiographs from 4 sites in one quaternary referral health system. From these radiographs, 1559 were used for training, 207 for validation, and 206 for external testing. Performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, as compared with a reference standard of implant model from operative reports with implant serial numbers. Results: The training and validation data sets from 1715 patients and 1766 AP radiographs included 18 different femoral components across four leading implant manufacturers and 10 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. After 1000 training epochs by the deep-learning system, the system discriminated 18 implant models with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.999, accuracy of 99.6%, sensitivity of 94.3%, and specificity of 99.8% in the external-testing data set of 206 AP radiographs. Conclusions: A deep-learning system using AP plain radiographs accurately differentiated among 18 hip arthroplasty models from four industry leading manufacturers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S290 / +
页数:6
相关论文