Investigating validity and reliability evidence for the maternal antenatal attachment scale in a sample of Italian women

被引:28
|
作者
Busonera, Alessandra [1 ]
Cataudella, Stefania [2 ]
Lampis, Jessica [2 ]
Tommasi, Marco [3 ]
Zavattini, Giulio Cesare [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome, Dept Dynam & Clin Psychol Sapienza, Via Apuli 1, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cagliari, Dept Pedag Psychol Philosophy, Via Is Mirrionis 1, Cagliari, Italy
[3] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Psychol Sci Humanities & Terr BG Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
关键词
Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS); Reliability; Validity; Maternal-fetal attachment; Pregnancy; PRENATAL ATTACHMENT; FETAL ATTACHMENT; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00737-015-0559-3
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
This study focused on the development of the emotional tie of the expectant mother towards her unborn child and aimed to achieve structural and external validity evidence for an Italian version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS; Br J Med Psychol 66: 167-183, 1993). The MAAS was translated into Italian and was administered to a sample of 482 Italian expectant women (age 20-43 years), together with other questionnaires measuring maternal-fetal attachment, psychological well-being, and relational variables. The hypothesised relationships with external concurrent and predictive criteria were substantiated. Internal consistencies were adequate for the total scale and for one of the two subscales. Confirmatory factor analyses provided general support for an oblique two-factor model, with minor model misfit. Therefore, an exploratory factor analysis with oblimin rotation was performed. The findings suggested that some items may represent extraneous constructs. Implications for future research regarding the functioning of the instrument are addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 336
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Maternal Ambivalence Scale
    Erbil, Nulufer
    Yanik, Hilal Gul Boyraz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [32] Surveying prenatal attachment in fathers: the Italian adaptation of the Paternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (PAAS-IT)
    Della Vedova, Anna M.
    Burro, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 35 (05) : 493 - 508
  • [33] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale
    Choi, Yookyung
    Kim, Suk-Sun
    ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [34] Reliability and validity of an interview assessment of attachment representations in a clinical sample of adolescents
    Scharfe, E
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT RESEARCH, 2002, 17 (05) : 532 - 551
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-12: Attachment dimensions in a clinical sample with eating disorders
    Tasca, Giorgio A.
    Brugnera, Agostino
    Baldwin, Danielle
    Carlucci, Samantha
    Compare, Angelo
    Balfour, Louise
    Proulx, Genevieve
    Gick, Mary
    Lafontaine, Marie-France
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2018, 51 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [36] The Stirling Antenatal Anxiety Scale (SAAS): Turkish validity and reliability study
    Celebi, Elif Zahide
    Tozkir, Elif
    Cayir, Gulsen
    Murat, Merve
    Beji, Nezihe Kizilkaya
    Avci, Nilgun
    Sinesi, Andrea
    MIDWIFERY, 2024, 136
  • [37] A SOCIAL ATTITUDE SCALE - EVIDENCE ON RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    KERLINGER, FN
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1970, 26 (02) : 379 - +
  • [38] Evidence of reliability and validity for the universal orientation scale
    Nicol, Adelheid A. M.
    Botes, Kathleen
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2006, 99 (03) : 930 - 932
  • [39] Adult Attachment Questionnaire: evidence of validity in a sample of IPVAW offenders
    de la Osa-Subtil, Iria
    Astray, Andres Arias
    Fernandez, Pedro Vicente Mateo
    de Dios-Duarte, Maria Jose
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [40] Reliability and validity evidence for the institutional integration scale
    French, BF
    Oakes, W
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 64 (01) : 88 - 98