Post-mortem privacy and informational self-determination

被引:22
|
作者
Buitelaar, J. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Inst Law Technol & Soc, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Minist Educ & Sci, Data Protect Author, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Digital legacy; Post-mortem privacy; Informational self-determination; Human dignity; Novel personae;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-017-9421-9
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Post-mortem privacy is becoming a vital topic of public and scholarly legal concern. Post-mortem privacy is understood as the right of a person to preserve and control what becomes of his reputation and dignity after death. The assumption that the deceased does not qualify for privacy rights, because his bodily presence has been terminated, no longer holds in our networked society. In the digital age, the phenomenon of the digital legacy that an Internet user leaves behind after his demise, has led to new challenges for the legal system. The deceased is no longer in a position to exercise human autonomy as an active agent. The article reconsiders the notion of human autonomy with regard to these digital representations. Taking the point of view that the control over personal information (also known as informational self-determination) is essential in protecting one's privacy in the antemortem life, the article explores whether this principle may have validity in the postmortem context. Legal philosophical arguments are advanced in a discourse about the quandary if digital personae of deceased persons can be bestowed with a legal basis of personality rights and concomitantly privacy rights. Therefore much attention is given to the problem of the subject, which does not seem to be functioning in the case of the absence of a living subject. Briefly referring to novel personae, it is argued that fundamental human rights need not be limited to the rights of living human beings.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Designing databases that enhance people’s privacy without hindering organizationsTowards informational self-determination
    Thomas B. Hodel-Widmer
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2006, 8 (1) : 3 - 15
  • [22] Novel method for determination of myofibril fragmentation post-mortem
    Lametsch, R.
    Knudsen, J. C.
    Ertbjerg, P.
    Oksbjerg, N.
    Therkildsen, M.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2007, 75 (04) : 719 - 724
  • [23] Post-mortem intervals estimation by determination of insect diversity
    Hamid, Esha
    Riaz, Saffora
    Munir, Maira
    Manzoor, Farkhanda
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2024,
  • [24] DETERMINATION OF LABETALOL IN A POST-MORTEM CASE USING HPLC
    PANNELL, LK
    THOMSON, BM
    WILKINSON, LF
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1982, 6 (04) : 193 - 195
  • [25] Post-mortem toxicology
    Drummer, Olaf H.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 165 (2-3) : 199 - 203
  • [26] Post-mortem technique
    不详
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1935, 1935 : 933 - 934
  • [27] POST-MORTEM MICROBIOLOGY
    ALVAREZ, RM
    SAENZ, JLP
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1983, 81 (15): : 667 - 669
  • [28] Post-mortem toxicology
    Skopp, G.
    RECHTSMEDIZIN, 2008, 18 (06) : 473 - 484
  • [29] POST-MORTEM BACTERIOLOGY
    WORT, AJ
    WALTON, EW
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1966, 1 (5487): : 611 - &
  • [30] Nondelegation: A post-mortem
    Posner, EA
    Vermeule, A
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2003, 70 (04): : 1331 - 1344