Effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the repair of bulk fill composites: A randomised controlled study

被引:7
|
作者
Blum, Igor R. [1 ]
Martos, Renata [2 ]
Szaloki, Melinda [3 ]
Lynch, Christopher D. [4 ]
Hegedus, Csaba [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Fac Dent Oral & Craniofacial Sci, London, England
[2] Univ Debrecen, Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, Nagyerdei Krt 98, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[3] Univ Debrecen, Dept Biomat & Prosthet Dent, Fac Dent, Nagyerdei Krt 98, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Univ Dent Sch & Hosp, Dept Restorat Dent, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Bulk fill composite; Adhesive systems; Repair; TENSILE BOND STRENGTH; SHRINKAGE-STRESS; RESIN-COMPOSITES; DENTIN; AGENTS; CONVERSION; CURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103637
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effect of different adhesive protocols on the microtensile bond strength (?TBS) and integrity of the repaired bulk fill composite interface. Methods: Two hundred and seventy composite blocks made of bulk fill composites of different viscosity were randomly assigned to 18 surface conditioning groups (n = 15/group). The universal adhesive systems used were HeliobondTM, Tokuyama bond force IITM and Scotchbond UniversalTM. A nanohybrid resin composite was applied as the repair material. Negative and positive control groups were included. Stick shape specimens of each group were subjected to ?TBS testing. Representative samples from all test groups were subjected to microscopic, profilometric and SEM examination to determine their mode of failure. The data were analysed statistically using two-way ANOVA test, Tukey?s test and the independent t-test (? = 0.05). Results: The mean ?TBS of all test groups ranged between 28.5 and 46.8 MPa and varied with the type of adhesive system employed. Significantly highest ?TBS values were obtained when Tokuyama bond force IITM and Scotchbond UniversalTM adhesives were used (p 0.01) which were comparable to the coherent strength of the bulk fill resin composite in the positive control groups (p 0.05). The viscosity of the bulk fill composite did not significantly influence repair bond strength. The microscopy and SEM examination of the failed interfaces revealed a mixture of adhesive and cohesive failures. Conclusions: Under the tested conditions, significantly greater ?TBS of repaired bulk fill composite was achieved when the substrate surface was treated with adhesive systems containing a functional monomer. Clinical significance: Eff ;ecting a repair of a bulk fill resin composite restoration with the application of a functional monomer containing adhesive system, such as Tokuyama Bond Force IITM or Scotchbond UniversalTM, would seem to enhance the interfacial bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Effects of Desensitizers, Temporary Cements, and Dentin Cleaning Methods on the Bond Strength of Self-Etch/Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin: An In Vitro Study
    Ugur, Mehmet
    Kavut, Idris
    Kulunk, Safak
    Akdeniz, Mehmet Serif
    Tanrikut, Ozgur Ozan
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [12] A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel
    Van Meerbeek, B
    Kanumilli, P
    De Munck, J
    Van Landuyt, K
    Lambrechts, P
    Peumans, M
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (04) : 375 - 383
  • [13] The effects of amalgam contamination and different surface modifications on microleakage of dentin bonded to bulk fill composite when using different adhesive protocols
    Nojoud Alshehri
    Abdullah Aljamhan
    Mohammed Bin-Shuwaish
    BMC Oral Health, 22
  • [14] The effects of amalgam contamination and different surface modifications on microleakage of dentin bonded to bulk fill composite when using different adhesive protocols
    Alshehri, Nojoud
    Aljamhan, Abdullah
    Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [15] Effects of different surface treatments of zirconia on the bond strength of self-adhesive resinous cement
    Zanatta, Rayssa Ferreira
    Lacerda Rangel Esper, Maria Angela
    Pucci, Cesar Rogerio
    Borges, Alessandra Buhler
    Gomes Torres, Carlos Rocha
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 21 - 30
  • [16] The effect of different application modes of a 1-step self-etch adhesive on the clinical performance of Class I composite restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Demirci, Mustafa
    Tuncer, Safa
    Tekce, Neslihan
    Baydemir, Canan
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (07) : 1039 - 1050
  • [17] Effects of different universal adhesives and surface treatments on repair bond strength between resin composites
    Yilmaz, Fatma
    Yazkan, Basak
    Herguner Siso, Seyda
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (07) : 1068 - 1076
  • [18] Evaluation of the shear bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and sonic/ thermoviscous bulk-fill composites with different surface treatments
    Senol, Ayse Asli
    Gencer, Busra Karabulut
    Kaya, Bengu Dogu
    Kahramanoglu, Erkut
    Atali, Pinar Yilmaz
    Tarcin, Bilge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2024, 134
  • [19] Efficiency of self-adhering flowable resin composite and different surface treatments in composite repair using a universal adhesive
    Sismanoglu, S.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 22 (12) : 1675 - 1679
  • [20] Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study
    Ellithy, Mohamed S.
    Abdelrahman, Mohamed H.
    Afifi, Rania R.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 36 (09) : 1311 - 1325