Multi-criteria decision making paradigm for selection of best printing parameters of fused deposition modeling

被引:8
|
作者
Deomore, Srishti A. [1 ]
Raykar, Sunil J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Coll Engn Pune, Pune 411005, Maharashtra, India
[2] DY Patil Coll Engn & Technol, Kolhapur 416006, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Fused deposition modeling; VIKOR; Optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.632
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive Manufacturing (AM) is one of the most advanced production methods that produce highprecision parts with virtually negligible material waste. Additive manufacturing, as its name suggests, produces the components by adding the material layer by layer up-to the final shape of the component. Due to its design and manufacturing freedom it is very popular amongst many manufacturing plants across the world. It has wide range of applications in sectors like aerospace, automobile, construction and in many medical applications. One of the AM processes used to produce a variety of plastic components for different applications is Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). FDM produces parts by heating and extruding plastic filaments through a small nozzle, the motion of which is controlled by a computer, defined by a 3D model with a number of layers. The performance of FDM also depends on its process parameters, as do other manufacturing processes. Different process parameters such as layer thickness, infill percentage, bed temperature, printing speed, infill pattern, build orientation, air gap and raster angle have a significant impact on the FDM process. This paper focuses on optimization of process parameters of FDM using VIKOR technique. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials, Processing & Characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:2562 / 2565
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF THE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR MACHINE SELECTION PROBLEM
    Eraslan, Erguen
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 642 - 647
  • [42] Multi-Criteria Decision Making For Determining A Simple Model of Supplier Selection
    Harwati
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING, OPTIMIZATION, INDUSTRIAL AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 215
  • [43] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [44] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [45] A hybrid multi-criteria decision making algorithm for cloud service selection
    Saha M.
    Panda S.K.
    Panigrahi S.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2021, 13 (4) : 1417 - 1422
  • [46] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [47] Hard coating material selection using multi-criteria decision making
    Chauhan, Aditya
    Vaish, Rahul
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2013, 44 : 240 - 245
  • [48] Service Selection Using Multi-criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Overview
    Mehdi Hosseinzadeh
    Hawkar Kamaran Hama
    Marwan Yassin Ghafour
    Mohammad Masdari
    Omed Hassan Ahmed
    Hemn Khezri
    Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2020, 28 : 1639 - 1693
  • [49] 3PL Selection: A Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach
    Bansal, A.
    Kumar, P.
    Issar, S.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM 2013), 2013, : 981 - 985
  • [50] Multi-criteria decision making entropy model for project portfolio selection
    Wang, Zhaohong
    Zhan, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK MANAGEMENT & GLOBAL E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1033 - 1037