Bridging 2D and 3D culture: Probing impact of extracellular environment on fibroblast activation in layered hydrogels

被引:27
|
作者
Smithmyer, Megan E. [1 ]
Cassel, Samantha E. [1 ]
Kloxin, April M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Chem & Biomol Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Mat Sci & Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fibroblasts; fibrosis; hydrogels; multidimensional controlled cell culture; synthetic extracellular matrices; IN-VITRO; GENE-EXPRESSION; SMOOTH-MUSCLE; MATRIX; CADHERIN-11; FIBROSIS; DIFFERENTIATION; MYOFIBROBLAST; ELASTICITY; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1002/aic.16837
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Many cell behaviors are significantly affected by cell culture geometry, though it remains unclear which geometry from two- to three-dimensional (2D-3D) culture is appropriate for probing a specific cell function and mimicking native microenvironments. Toward addressing this, we established a 2.5D culture geometry, enabling initial cell spreading while reducing polarization to bridge between 2D and 3D geometries, and examined the responses of wound healing cells, human pulmonary fibroblasts, within it. To achieve this, we used engineered biomimetic hydrogels formed by photopolymerization, creating robust layered hydrogels with spread fibroblasts at the interface. We found that fibroblast responses were similar between 2D and 2.5D culture and different from 3D culture, with some underlying differences in mechanotransduction. These studies established the 2.5D cell culture geometry in conjunction with biomimetic synthetic matrices as a useful tool for investigations of fibroblast activation with relevance to the study of other cell functions and types.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D
    Almeid Santos, A. T.
    Pais, A. S.
    Reis, S.
    Laranjo, M.
    Caramelo, F.
    Silva, F.
    Botelho, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 341 - 342
  • [22] Controlled growth of layered silver stearate on 2D and 3D surfaces
    Lee, SJ
    Han, SW
    Kim, K
    ETRI JOURNAL, 2003, 25 (06) : 517 - 522
  • [23] InSe as a case between 3D and 2D layered crystals for excitons
    T. V. Shubina
    W. Desrat
    M. Moret
    A. Tiberj
    O. Briot
    V. Yu. Davydov
    A. V. Platonov
    M. A. Semina
    B. Gil
    Nature Communications, 10
  • [24] 2D→3D transformation of layered aluminosilicate upon base treatment
    Lee, SR
    Han, YS
    Choy, JH
    SOLID STATE IONICS, 2002, 151 (1-4) : 343 - 346
  • [25] Bridging the Gap between 2D and 3D Visual Question Answering: A Fusion Approach for 3D VQA
    Mo, Wentao
    Liu, Yang
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 5, 2024, : 4261 - 4268
  • [26] GaussianDreamer: Fast Generation from Text to 3D Gaussians by Bridging 2D and 3D Diffusion Models
    Yi, Taoran
    Fang, Jiemin
    Wang, Junjie
    Wu, Guanjun
    Xie, Lingxi
    Zhang, Xiaopeng
    Liu, Wenyu
    Tian, Qi
    Wang, Xinggang
    2024 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, CVPR 2024, 2024, : 6796 - 6807
  • [27] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [28] Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture
    Chaudhuri, Ovijit
    BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE, 2017, 5 (08) : 1480 - 1490
  • [29] Bioinspired Hydrogels for 3D Organoid Culture
    Blondel, Delphine
    Lutolf, Matthias P.
    CHIMIA, 2019, 73 (1-2) : 81 - 85
  • [30] 3D Cell Culture-Can It Be As Popular as 2D Cell Culture?
    Sun, Miao
    Liu, An
    Yang, Xiaofu
    Gong, Jiaxing
    Yu, Mengfei
    Yao, Xinhua
    Wang, Huiming
    He, Yong
    ADVANCED NANOBIOMED RESEARCH, 2021, 1 (05):