From smart growth to European spatial planning: a new paradigm for EU cohesion policy post-2020

被引:19
|
作者
Medeiros, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Geog & Spatial Planning IGOT, CEG, Edificio IGOT,Rua Branca Edmee Marques, P-1600276 Lisbon, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EU cohesion policy; territorial cohesion; European spatial planning; territorial cooperation; territorial development; ASSESSING TERRITORIAL IMPACTS; INNER SCANDINAVIA; COOPERATION; REGIONS; REFORM;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2017.1337729
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Formally initiated in 1989, European Union (EU) cohesion policy (ECP) has since passed through a series of metamorphoses, along its five programming periods, while becoming the most financed EU policy. As its name indicates, its initial goals were earmarked for promoting economic and social cohesion, following the intentions expressed in the Single European Act. Since then, from a policy strategy intervention point of view, ECP has shifted into a financial tool to promote investment for growth and jobs. In the meantime, European spatial planning (ESP), which had its debating pinnacle with the release of the European Spatial Development Perspective, by 1999, has declined in interest and narrowed into a novel notion of Territorial Cohesion. In this challenging context, this article analyses the implementation and main impacts of ECP and proposes a new strategic paradigm, built around a novel ESP' vision, backed by the main pillars and dimensions of territorial development and cohesion. More particularly, we suggest that the current rationale for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth could instead fuel an alternative strategic design based on a cohesive and sustainable development vision: green economy, balanced territory, good governance and social cohesion.
引用
收藏
页码:1856 / 1875
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cohesion Policy Spending in the New Member States of the EU in an Endogenous Growth Model
    Varga, Janos
    in 't Veld, Jan
    EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2011, 49 (05) : 29 - 54
  • [22] Is smart specialisation monopolising the research on the EU cohesion policy? Evidence from a bibliometric analysis
    Francesco Foglia
    Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 1001 - 1021
  • [23] Is smart specialisation monopolising the research on the EU cohesion policy? Evidence from a bibliometric analysis
    Foglia, Francesco
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (02) : 1001 - 1021
  • [24] Cluster Analysis on Cohesion Policy Towards Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
    Bere, Ramona Camelia
    Bucerzan , Ioana
    ROMANIAN STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2015, (04) : 95 - 111
  • [25] Changing the fallow paradigm: A win-win strategy for the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy to halt farmland bird declines
    Tarjuelo, Rocio
    Margalida, Antoni
    Mougeot, Francois
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (03) : 642 - 649
  • [26] Between Growth and Cohesion: New Directions in Central and East European Regional Policy
    Ferry, Martin
    McMaster, Irene
    EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES, 2013, 65 (08) : 1499 - 1501
  • [27] European Union Cohesion Policy Post 2014: More (Place-Based and Conditional) Growth - Less Redistribution and Cohesion
    Avdikos, Vasilis
    Chardas, Anastassios
    TERRITORY POLITICS GOVERNANCE, 2016, 4 (01) : 97 - 117
  • [28] Territorial Cohesion as a Policy Narrative: From Economic Competitiveness to 'Smart' Growth and Beyond
    Artelaris, Panagiotis
    Mavrommatis, George
    SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2020, 8 (04) : 208 - 217
  • [29] China's Ecological Conservation Redline policy is a new opportunity to meet post-2020 protected area targets
    Choi, Chi-Yeung
    Shi, Xu
    Shi, Jianbin
    Gan, Xiaojing
    Wen, Chujun
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Jackson, Micha V.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Gibson, Luke
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2022, 15 (02):
  • [30] REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS AT THE DOORSTEP OF POST 2020 COHESION POLICY - STATUS REPORT FROM HUNGARY
    Simo, Balazs
    Gordos, Tamas
    Jozsa, Viktoria
    DETUROPE-THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM, 2018, 10 (03): : 14 - 32