Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of a refrigerator-stable versus a frozen formulation of ProQuad (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella virus vaccine live)

被引:10
|
作者
Bernstein, Henry H.
Eves, Karen
Campbell, Kristy
Black, Steven B.
Twiggs, Jerry D.
Reisinger, Keith S.
Conti, Ralph M.
Flodmark, Carl-Erik
Rombo, Lars
Klopfer, Stephanie
Schodel, Florian
Hartzel, Jonathan
Kuter, Barbara J.
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Dartmouth, Darmouth Med Sch, Lebanon, NH USA
[2] Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Vaccine Study Ctr, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Dixie Pediat, St George, UT USA
[5] Primary Physicians Res, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Foothills Pediat, Henderson, NV USA
[7] Univ Hosp, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Dept Pediat, Malmo, Sweden
[8] Malarsjukhuset, Dept Infect Dis, Eskiltuna, Sweden
关键词
measles; mumps; rubella; varicella; vaccine; ProQuad; Varivax; M-M-RII; immunization;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2006-2283
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. A refrigerator-stable formulation of ProQuad has been developed to expand the utility of ProQuad to areas in which maintenance of a frozen cold chain (- 15 degrees C or colder) during storage and transport may not be feasible. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the immunogenicity and safety profiles of a refrigerator-stable formulation of ProQuad are similar to the recently licensed frozen formulation. Methods. In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, healthy 12- to 23-month- old children with negative vaccination and clinical histories for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, and zoster were vaccinated with either the refrigerator-stable formulation of ProQuad (N = 1006) or the frozen formulation of ProQuad (N = 513). Patients were followed for 42 days after vaccination for adverse experiences. Immunogenicity was evaluated 6 weeks after vaccination. Results. The refrigerator-stable formulation of ProQuad was generally well tolerated. The incidence of adverse experiences was similar between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse experiences were reported. For both groups, the response rate was >= 97.7% for measles, mumps, and rubella, and the percentage of patients with a varicella zoster virus antibody titer of >= 5 U/mL glycoprotein antigen-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay after vaccination was >= 88.8%. The geometric mean titers for all antigens were numerically slightly higher in patients who received the refrigerator-stable formulation. Conclusions. The refrigerator-stable formulation of ProQuad is generally well tolerated, highly immunogenic, and noninferior in terms of postvaccination antibody responses. This refrigerator-stable formulation may improve ease of vaccine administration, increase use of the vaccine throughout the world because of its improved storage conditions, and replace the frozen formulation of ProQuad or any dose of M-M-RII and Varivax in routine practice.
引用
收藏
页码:E1299 / E1305
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (Priorix-Tetra™): Immunogenicity and safety profile (vol 27, pg 6504, 2009)
    Czajka, Hanna
    Schuster, Volker
    Zepp, Fred
    Esposito, Susanna
    Douha, Martine
    Willems, Paul
    VACCINE, 2012, 30 (52) : 7667 - 7667
  • [43] Safety and immunogenicity of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in children with congenital immunodeficiency (DiGeorge syndrome)
    Azzari, C
    Gambineri, E
    Resti, M
    Moriondo, M
    Betti, L
    Saldias, LR
    Gelli, AMG
    Vierucci, A
    VACCINE, 2005, 23 (14) : 1668 - 1671
  • [44] Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a single dose of live attenuated varicella vaccine and a booster dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine given concomitantly at 12 years of age
    Parment, PA
    Svahn, A
    Rudén, U
    Bråkenhielm, G
    Storsaeter, J
    Åkesson, L
    Linde, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 35 (10) : 736 - 742
  • [45] REACTOGENICITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A LIVE-ATTENUATED REFRIGERATOR-STABLE VARICELLA VACCINE (OKA STRAIN) IN HEALTHY SERONEGATIVE SUBJECTS AGE 10 MONTHS TO 12 YEARS
    Hadinegoro, S. R. H.
    Hindra, I. S.
    Han, H. H.
    Gatchalian, S.
    Bock, H. L.
    SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 40 (05) : 991 - 999
  • [46] INTERFERENCE BETWEEN STRAINS IN LIVE VIRUS-VACCINES .2. COMBINED VACCINATION WITH VARICELLA AND MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE
    BERGER, R
    JUST, M
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION, 1988, 16 (04): : 275 - 279
  • [47] Concomitant administration of a bivalent Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B vaccine, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine:: safety, tolerability and immunogenicity
    Hesley, TM
    Reisinger, KS
    Sullivan, BJ
    Jensen, EH
    Stasiorowski, S
    Meechan, CD
    Chan, CY
    West, DJ
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (03) : 240 - 245
  • [48] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VACCINATION OF MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH A LIVE ATTENUATED MEASLES, MUMPS, AND RUBELLA VACCINE
    LJUNGMAN, P
    FRIDELL, E
    LONNQVIST, B
    BOLME, P
    BOTTIGER, M
    GAHRTON, G
    LINDE, A
    RINGDEN, O
    WAHREN, B
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1989, 159 (04): : 610 - 615
  • [49] Immunogenicity and safety of the combined vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella isolated or combined with the varicella component administered at 3-month intervals: randomised study
    dos Santos, Eliane Matos
    Noronha, Tatiana Guimaraes
    Alves, Isabelle Soares
    de Souza Cruz, Robson Leite
    de Vasconcellos Ferroco, Clara Lucy
    Brum, Ricardo Cristiano
    Nunes de Oliveira, Patricia Mouta
    Siqueira, Marilda Mendonca
    Lima, Mariza Cristina
    de Paula Ramos, Francisco Luzio
    Bragagnolo, Camila de Marco
    Bastos Camacho, Luiz Antonio
    de Sousa Maia, Maria de Lourdes
    MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ, 2019, 114
  • [50] A combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (Priorix-Tetra ⟨trade⟩): Immunogenicity and safety profile (vol 27, pg 6504, 2009)
    Czajka, Hanna
    Schuster, Volker
    Zepp, Fred
    Esposito, Susanna
    Douha, Martine
    Willems, Paul
    VACCINE, 2010, 28 (52) : 8352 - 8352