Interpretation of machine-learning-based disruption models for plasma control

被引:14
|
作者
Parsons, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nucl Plasma & Radiol Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
plasma disruptions; disruption prediction; disruption avoidance; plasma control; machine learning; PREDICTION; CAMPAIGNS; JET;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6587/aa72a3
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
While machine learning techniques have been applied within the context of fusion for predicting plasma disruptions in tokamaks, they are typically interpreted with a simple 'yes/no' prediction or perhaps a probability forecast. These techniques take input signals, which could be real-time signals from machine diagnostics, to make a prediction of whether a transient event will occur. A major criticism of these methods is that, due to the nature of machine learning, there is no clear correlation between the input signals and the output prediction result. Here is proposed a simple method that could be applied to any existing prediction model to determine how sensitive the state of a plasma is at any given time with respect to the input signals. This is accomplished by computing the gradient of the decision function, which effectively identifies the quickest path away from a disruption as a function of the input signals and therefore could be used in a plasma control setting to avoid them. A numerical example is provided for illustration based on a support vector machine model, and the application to real data is left as an open opportunity.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ensemble Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Models for the Compressive Strength of Recycled Powder Mortar
    Fei, Zhengyu
    Liang, Shixue
    Cai, Yiqing
    Shen, Yuanxie
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (02)
  • [32] Comprehensive strategies of machine-learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship models
    Mao, Jiashun
    Akhtar, Javed
    Zhang, Xiao
    Sun, Liang
    Guan, Shenghui
    Li, Xinyu
    Chen, Guangming
    Liu, Jiaxin
    Jeon, Hyeon-Nae
    Kim, Min Sung
    No, Kyoung Tai
    Wang, Guanyu
    ISCIENCE, 2021, 24 (09)
  • [33] Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Virtual Machine Allocation and Migration
    Talwani, Suruchi
    Singla, Jimmy
    Mathur, Gauri
    Malik, Navneet
    Jhanjhi, N. Z.
    Masud, Mehedi
    Aljahdali, Sultan
    ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [34] Dynamically weighted ensemble of geoscientific models via automated machine-learning-based classification
    Chen, Hao
    Wang, Tiejun
    Zhang, Yonggen
    Bai, Yun
    Chen, Xi
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 16 (19) : 5685 - 5701
  • [35] Sonic Well-Log Imputation Through Machine-Learning-Based Uncertainty Models
    Maldonado-Cruz, Eduardo
    Foster, John T.
    Pyrcz, Michael J.
    PETROPHYSICS, 2023, 64 (02): : 253 - 270
  • [36] Material characterization of human middle ear using machine-learning-based surrogate models
    Ebrahimian, Arash
    Mohammadi, Hossein
    Maftoon, Nima
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2024, 153
  • [37] Machine-learning-based models in particle-in-cell codes for advanced physics extensions
    Badiali, Chiara
    Bilbao, Pablo J. J.
    Cruz, Fabio
    Silva, Luis O.
    JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS, 2022, 88 (06)
  • [38] Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Models for Compressive Strength, Flexural Strength, and Slump of Concrete
    Vargas, John F.
    Oviedo, Ana I.
    Ortega, Nathalia A.
    Orozco, Estebana
    Gomez, Ana
    Londono, Jorge M.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [39] Machine-learning-based prediction models in patients with azoospermia caused by azoospermia factor microdeletions
    Sun, Feiyue
    Zhang, Jiatong
    Sun, Yuyao
    Shen, Jiahuan
    Fan, Ting
    Zhang, Bijun
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 15 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [40] Machine-learning-based predictive models for estimating seismically-induced slope displacements
    Macedo, Jorge
    Liu, Chenying
    Soleimani, Farahnaz
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 148