Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

被引:7
|
作者
Sato, Hirotaka [1 ]
Abe, Hirokazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Atsushi [3 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [4 ]
Sato, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Tsukada, Sachiyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, 3-2-1 Higashihara Cyo, Mito, Ibaraki 3100035, Japan
[2] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Urol, Ibaraki, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[5] Eastern Oomiya Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Elderly; minimally invasive surgery; perioperative morbidity; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; anatomical correction rate; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; UROGYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; WOMEN; TERMINOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; COHORT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1867968
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged >= 75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged >= 75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity. What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the >= 75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Prospective Study of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse EDITORIAL COMMENT
    North, C. E.
    Ali-Ross, N. S.
    Smith, A. R. B.
    Reid, F. M.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2009, 64 (11) : 719 - 720
  • [42] Vaginal-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (VALS) With Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Welch, Eva K.
    Dengler, Katherine L.
    Gisseman, Jordan
    Gruber, Daniel D.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 32 (01) : 12 - 13
  • [43] Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse
    Mija Blaganje
    Fouad Lutfallah
    Bruno Deval
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 1117 - 1119
  • [44] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse
    Christine Louis-Sylvestre
    Martine Herry
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24 : 731 - 733
  • [45] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair: A retrospective cohort study
    Cho, Eun Hye
    Shin, Eun Seo
    Kim, Sung Yob
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 78
  • [46] Meta-analysis of the comparison of laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Xiao, Tingwei
    Du, Junxiao
    Geng, Jianfang
    Li, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024,
  • [47] Variation in the practice of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Dutch survey
    van IJsselmuiden, Melanie N.
    Kerkhof, Manon H.
    Schellart, Rene P.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Spaans, Wilbert A.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (05) : 757 - 764
  • [48] Variation in the practice of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Dutch survey
    Mèlanie N. van IJsselmuiden
    Manon H. Kerkhof
    René P. Schellart
    Marlies Y. Bongers
    Wilbert A. Spaans
    Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 757 - 764
  • [49] Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse
    J. C. Martín del Olmo
    M. Toledano
    M. L. Martín Esteban
    M. A. Montenegro
    J. R. Gómez
    P. Concejo
    M. Rodríguez de Castro
    F. del Rio
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 1075 - 1079
  • [50] Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse
    Martin del Olmo, J. C.
    Toledano, M.
    Martin Esteban, M. L.
    Montenegro, M. A.
    Gomez, J. R.
    Concejo, P.
    Rodriguez de Castro, M.
    del Rio, F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (04): : 1075 - 1079