Research and Quality Improvement: How Can They Work Together?

被引:0
|
作者
Paulus, Amber B. [1 ]
Davey, Christine Horvat [2 ]
Feldner, Katie D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Qual Insights, Data Sci, Williamsburg, VA 11206 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Northeast Wisconsin Tech Coll, Green Bay, WI USA
关键词
Quality improvement; research; nephrology; kidney disease;
D O I
10.37526/1526-744X.2022.49.2.177
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Research and quality improvement (QI) are distinct concepts and differ regarding the contextual, temporal, and inclusive nature of the domain (Foster, 2013). The focus of research is to contribute to generalizable knowledge based on scientific inquiry. The dissemination of research to clinical practice is an extensive process that has long been understood to take approximately 17 years (Balas & Boren, 2000; Holtrop et al., 2018). The focus of QI is to improve processes and outcomes based on systematic data collection. The implementation of QI is timely, often resulting in immediate change and advances in processes and outcomes (Foster, 2013). QI can lead to the identification of important practice problems and gaps in science that can inform future research. Though research and QI are discrete concepts, they can work synergistically to improve patient care and health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HOW QUALITY CIRCLES CAN WORK TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF LIFE
    不详
    FOOD ENGINEERING, 1984, 56 (10): : 128 - 128
  • [32] Can we work together?
    Aylor, JH
    COMPUTER, 2001, 34 (01) : 4 - 4
  • [33] Kin can work together
    Davis, RL
    ABA JOURNAL, 2003, 89 : 16 - 17
  • [34] How to Distinguish Research From Quality Improvement
    Cooper, Jeffrey A.
    McNair, Lindsay
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (02) : 209 - 210
  • [35] What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?
    Batalden, Paul B.
    Davidoff, Frank
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (01): : 2 - 3
  • [36] How can we recognize continuous quality improvement?
    Rubenstein, Lisa
    Khodyakov, Dmitry
    Hempel, Susanne
    Danz, Margie
    Salem-Schatz, Susanne
    Foy, Robbie
    O'Neill, Sean
    Dalal, Siddhartha
    Shekelle, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [37] Working together: reflections on how to make public involvement in research work
    Lynn McVey
    Tina Frost
    Basma Issa
    Eva Davison
    Jamil Abdulkader
    Rebecca Randell
    Natasha Alvarado
    Hadar Zaman
    Nicholas Hardiker
    V.-Lin Cheong
    David Woodcock
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)
  • [38] HOW CAN MAN AND MACHINE TRUST EACH OTHER AND WORK BETTER TOGETHER?
    Fukuda, Shuichi
    DETC 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATIONAL IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 3, PTS A AND B: 28TH COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2009, : 897 - 900
  • [39] OVERCOMING OUR MUTUAL ISOLATION: How Historians and Psychologists Can Work Together
    Weidman, Nadine
    HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 19 (03) : 248 - 253