Evaluation of the epic model for simulating crop yield and irrigation demand

被引:0
|
作者
Guerra, LC
Hoogenboom, G
Boken, VK
Hook, JE
Thomas, DL
Harrison, KA
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Natl Environmentally Sound Prod Agr Lab, Tifton, GA USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Ag Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
来源
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE | 2004年 / 47卷 / 06期
关键词
cotton; decision support system; EPIC model; irrigation; peanut; simulation models; soybean; water use;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
An understanding of water needs in agriculture is a critical input in resolving the water resource issues that confront many southeastern states. Unfortunately, how much water is required and how much water is actually being used for irrigation in Georgia is primarily estimated and largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model in simulating crop yield and irrigation demand for three major crops in Georgia. Model evaluation is necessary to provide credibility in applying the model for simulating water use by agriculture. Seasonal yield and irrigation data for the 1990 through 2001 crop variety trials conducted at five agricultural experiment stations were used to evaluate simulation of yield and irrigation amount. The root mean squared deviation (RMSD) for yield was 0.29 t/ha for cotton, 0.39 t/ha for soybean, and 1.02 t/ha for peanut. The RMSD for peanut was large because the model tended to underestimate high yields and was not as sensitive to the factors responsible for the year-to-year variability of peanut yield. The RMSD for total amount of irrigation was 75 mm for cotton, 83 mm for soybean, and 87 mm for peanut. The model simulated the mean irrigation amount and the magnitude of annual variability very well. The component of mean squared deviation (MSD = RMSD2) related to the pattern of annual variability in irrigation amount contributed most to MSD. Overall, the results showed that the EPIC model can be a useful tool for simulating crop yield and irrigation demand at a field level. Future efforts will focus on using the model for regional estimation of water use for irrigation in Georgia and other southeastern states.
引用
收藏
页码:2091 / 2100
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulating yield potential by irrigation and yield gap of rainfed soybean using APEX model in a humid region
    Zhang, Bangbang
    Feng, Gary
    Kong, Xiangbin
    Lal, Rattan
    Ouyang, Ying
    Adeli, Ardeshir
    Jenkins, Johnie N.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 177 : 440 - 453
  • [22] Improving the validation of model-simulated crop yield response to climate change: An application to the EPIC model
    Easterling, WE
    Chen, XF
    Hays, C
    Brandle, JR
    Zhang, HH
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (03) : 263 - 273
  • [23] Evaluation of soil water dynamics and crop yield under furrow irrigation witha two-dimensional flow and crop growth coupled model
    Wang, Jun
    Huang, Guanhua
    Zhan, Hongbin
    Mohanty, Binayak P.
    Zheng, Jianhua
    Huang, Quanzhong
    Xu, Xu
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 141 : 10 - 22
  • [24] A MODEL OF CROP YIELD RESPONSE TO IRRIGATION WATER SALINITY - THEORY, TESTING AND APPLICATION
    PRENDERGAST, JB
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1993, 13 (04) : 157 - 164
  • [25] Simulating interactive effect of irrigation and nitrogen on crop yield and water productivity in maize-wheat cropping system
    Lenka, Sangeeta
    Singh, A. K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2011, 101 (11): : 1451 - 1461
  • [26] THE EPIC CROP GROWTH-MODEL
    WILLIAMS, JR
    JONES, CA
    KINIRY, JR
    SPANEL, DA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1989, 32 (02): : 497 - 511
  • [27] Corn yield response to irrigation level, crop rotation, and irrigation system
    Sorensen, Ronald B.
    Lamb, Marshall C.
    Butts, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2022, 36 (05) : 701 - 716
  • [28] DEMAND FOR IRRIGATION WATER - THE EFFECT OF YIELD RISK
    SELLEY, R
    AYER, H
    EDMOND, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1982, 64 (05) : 1088 - 1089
  • [29] Physically Based Model for Simulating Flow in Furrow Irrigation. II: Model Evaluation
    Mailapalli, D. R.
    Raghuwanshi, N. S.
    Singh, R.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (06) : 747 - 754
  • [30] Simulating water content, crop yield and nitrate-N loss under free and controlled tile drainage with subsurface irrigation using the DSSAT model
    Liu, H. L.
    Yang, J. Y.
    Tan, C. S.
    Drury, C. F.
    Reynolds, W. D.
    Zhang, T. Q.
    Bai, Y. L.
    Jin, J.
    He, P.
    Hoogenboom, G.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 98 (06) : 1105 - 1111