Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Tests for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

被引:72
|
作者
LaRue, Nicole
Kahn, Maria
Murray, Marjorie
Leader, Brandon T.
Bansil, Pooja
McGray, Sarah
Kalnoky, Michael
Zhang, Hao
Huang, Huiqiang
Jiang, Hui
Domingo, Gonzalo J. [1 ]
机构
[1] PATH, Diagnost, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
来源
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
G6PD DEFICIENCY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.4269/ajtmh.14-0194
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A barrier to eliminating Plasmodium vivax malaria is inadequate treatment of infected patients. 8-Aminoquinoline-based drugs clear the parasite; however, people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency are at risk for hemolysis from these drugs. Understanding the performance of G6PD deficiency tests is critical for patient safety. Two quantitative assays and two qualitative tests were evaluated. The comparison of quantitative assays gave a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7585 with significant difference in mean G6PD activity, highlighting the need to adhere to a single reference assay. Both qualitative tests had high sensitivity and negative predictive value at a cutoff G6PD value of 40% of normal activity if interpreted conservatively and performed under laboratory conditions. The performance of both tests dropped at a cutoff level of 45%. Cytochemical staining of specimens confirmed that heterozygous females with > 50% G6PD-deficient cells can seem normal by phenotypic tests.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 861
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条