Integration of HOFs into ATEX Risk Assessment Methodology

被引:3
|
作者
Geng, Jie [1 ]
Mure, Salvina [1 ]
Camuncoli, Gianfranco [1 ]
Demichela, Micaela [2 ]
机构
[1] ARIA srl, Corso Mediterraneo 140, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] SAfeR, Politecn Turin, Dipartimento Sci Appl Technol, Turin, Italy
关键词
11;
D O I
10.3303/CET1436098
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The current ATEX (Explosive Atmosphere) risk assessment methodology relies on a semi-quantitative approach based on the following indexes: probability of an explosive atmosphere formation, probability of the presence of an effective ignition source and consequences. The whole risk assessment procedure can be separated into four steps - area classification, ignition sources identification, consequence analysis, and risk evaluation. However, when reviewing the whole ATEX risk assessment procedures and their results, despite many operations on plant and equipment containing dangerous substances are performed by operators, the human and organizational influences are neglected. The study proposed in this paper is to develop an ATEX risk assessment methodology with the integration of human and organizational factors (HOFs), in order to provide an advanced methodology able to analyse the HOFs influences on ATEX hazards. The developed ATEX risk assessment methodology introduces in the procedure the Technique for Human Error Rate Prediction (THERP) to identify human and organizational weaknesses, and also provides a tool for calculating the human error probability (HEP) in the first two risk steps - area classification and ignition sources identification. During the risk evaluation procedure, human risk level, based on the results of HEP, has been introduced into the original ATEX risk assessment methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR PIPELINE SYSTEMS
    ABES, AJ
    SALINAS, JJ
    ROGERS, JT
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1985, 2 (03) : 225 - 237
  • [32] METHODOLOGY ISSUES IN RISK ASSESSMENT FOR RADON
    HARLEY, NH
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 90 : 177 - 180
  • [33] Application of probabilistic risk assessment methodology to medical risk
    Miyata, Koichi
    Furuhama, Yutaka
    Yanagawa, Tatsuo
    Abstracts of the Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, 2004,
  • [34] Risk metrics and cumulative risk assessment methodology for the FQPA
    Sielken, RL
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 31 (03) : 300 - 307
  • [35] Integration of bioaccumulation in an environmental risk assessment
    Feijtel, T
    KloepperSams, P
    denHaan, K
    vanEgmond, R
    Comber, M
    Heusel, R
    Wierich, P
    TenBerge, W
    Gard, A
    deWolf, W
    Niessen, H
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1997, 34 (11) : 2337 - 2350
  • [36] Integration of New Technologies into Risk Assessment
    Cogliano, V. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 53 : S18 - S18
  • [37] A methodology for the assessment of dust explosion risks: Integration into a generic assessment system.
    Haesch, G
    Kanuga, K
    Lambert, PG
    Milburn, T
    Owen, OJR
    Ward, RJ
    HAZARDS XVI: ANALYSING THE PAST, PLANNING THE FUTURE, 2001, (148): : 833 - 845
  • [38] Towards a comprehensive sustainability methodology to assess anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems: Review of the integration of Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental Risk Assessment and Ecosystem Services Assessment
    Pena, Laura Vittoria De Luca
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Preat, Nils
    Boone, Lieselot
    Van der Biest, Katrien
    Custodio, Marco
    Lucas, Simon Hernandez
    Everaert, Gert
    Dewulf, Jo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 808
  • [39] A methodology for the flexibility assessment of site wide heat integration scenarios
    Kachacha, Christina
    Zoughaib, Assaad
    Cong Toan Tran
    ENERGY, 2018, 154 : 231 - 239
  • [40] Methodology for the Integration of Structural Health Assessment of Masonry Bridges into HBIM
    Cruz, Y.
    Cabaleiro, M.
    Conde, B.
    Barros, B.
    Riveiro, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2024,