Home visiting intervention for vulnerable families with newborns: Follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:82
|
作者
Fraser, JA
Armstrong, KL
Morris, JP
Dadds, MR
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Appl Psychol, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Royal Childrens Hosp, Community Child Hlth Serv, Fortitude Valley, Qld, Australia
[3] Dist Hlth Serv, Fortitude Valley, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
child abuse; child health; preventive medicine; home visiting; postpartum mood disorder;
D O I
10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00193-9
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to: (1) Assess the community utility of a screening tool to identify families with child abuse or neglect risk factors in the immediate postnatal period (2) Determine the social validity and effectiveness of a home visiting program using community child health nurses and offering social work services for identified families, and (3) identify factors in the immediate postnatal period associated with the child's environment that predict poor adjustment to the parenting role. Method: A randomized controlled trial using a cohort of 181 families was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a home visiting program. Mothers were recruited in the immediate postnatal period and allocated either into the home visiting program or into a comparison group. The research design required self-identification into the study by providing positive responses to a range of risk factors. A repeated measures design was used to test parenting stress and maternal depression from the immediate postnatal period to 12-month follow-up and physical child abuse potential to 18-month follow-up. To test whether measures taken in the immediate postnatal period were predictive for poor adjustment to the parenting role, a linear regression model was used. Results: The screening procedure was shown to have utility in the context of recruitment to a research trial and mothers were willing to accept the home visiting program examined by this study from the immediate postnatal period. From as early as 6 weeks the program demonstrated ability to impact positively on maternal, infant, family, and home environment variables (testing 90 randomly allocated intervention vs. 91 comparison families). At follow-up, parental adjustment variables were not significantly different between groups (testing the remaining 68 (75.5%) intervention vs. 70 (76.9%) comparison families) and horne environment assessment scores had converged. Predictive analysis of factors measured in the immediate postnatal period revealed an absence of any predictive value to demographic characteristics, which secondary prevention efforts typically target. Conclusions: Follow-up evaluation did not dt demonstrate a positive impact on parenting stress, parenting competence, or quality of the home environment confirming the need to test early program success on longer term outcomes. Further, the study not only demonstrated that there was a relationship between maternal, family and environmental factors identified in the immediate postnatal period. and adjustment to the parenting role, but also challenged demographic targeting for child abuse and neglect risk. At the same time, the immediate postnatal period presented an exciting window of opportunity to access high-risk, families who may otherwise have become marginalized from traditional services. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1399 / 1429
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Lasting effects of An Interdisciplinary Home Visiting Program on Child Behavior: Preliminary Follow-Up Results of a Randomized Trial (vol 29, pg 3, 2014)
    Ordway, Monica Roosa
    Sadler, Lois S.
    Dixon, Jane
    Close, Nancy
    Mayes, Linda
    Slade, Arietta
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2014, 29 (04): : 390 - 390
  • [32] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Healthy Families: 6-Month and 1-Year Follow-Up
    LeCroy, Craig Winston
    Lopez, Darlene
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2020, 21 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [33] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Healthy Families: 6-Month and 1-Year Follow-Up
    Craig Winston LeCroy
    Darlene Lopez
    Prevention Science, 2020, 21 : 25 - 35
  • [34] Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up
    Twisk, J
    Proper, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (03) : 223 - 228
  • [35] Randomised controlled trial: results at 12 months follow-up
    Zapata, M. A.
    Ruiz-Lazaro, Pedro M.
    Calvo, A. I.
    Villas, E.
    Calvo, D.
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 24 : S85 - S85
  • [36] Telephone Follow-up for Older Adults Discharged to Home from the Emergency Department: A randomized controlled trial
    Biese, K.
    Busby-Whitehead, J.
    Cai, J.
    Stearns, S.
    Roberts, E.
    Mihas, P.
    Emmett, D.
    Zhou, Q.
    Farmer, F.
    Kizer, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2017, 65 : S1 - S1
  • [37] Inpatient obesity intervention with postdischarge telephone follow-up: A randomized trial
    Wachsberg, Kelley N.
    Creden, Amanda
    Workman, Moira
    Lichten, Abbey
    Basil, Alka
    Lee, Jungwha
    Peng, Jie
    Williams, Mark V.
    Kushner, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2014, 9 (08) : 515 - 520
  • [38] A Randomized Controlled Trial on Mutual Support Group Intervention for Families of People With Recent-Onset Psychosis: A Four-Year Follow-Up
    Chien, Wai Tong
    Bressington, Daniel
    Chan, Sally W. C.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 9
  • [39] Neurofeedback and standard pharmacological intervention in ADHD: A randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up
    Meisel, Victoria
    Servera, Mateu
    Garcia-Banda, Gloria
    Cardo, Esther
    Moreno, Inmaculada
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 94 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [40] A client-centred ADL intervention: three-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
    Bertilsson, Ann-Sofie
    Ranner, Maria
    von Koch, Lena
    Eriksson, Gunilla
    Johansson, Ulla
    Ytterberg, Charlotte
    Guidetti, Susanne
    Tham, Kerstin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2014, 21 (05) : 377 - 391