Comparison of Dual to Single Contrast Bolus Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease

被引:10
|
作者
Groothuis, Jan G. J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kremers, Frans P. P. J. [2 ]
Beek, Aernout M. [1 ,3 ]
Brinckman, Stijn L. [1 ,3 ]
Tuinenburg, Alvin C. [1 ]
Jerosch-Herold, Michael [5 ]
van Rossum, Albert C. [1 ,3 ]
Hofman, Mark B. M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Phys & Med Technol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Inst Cardiovasc Res, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Interuniv Cardiol Inst Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging; absolute quantification; dual bolus; coronary artery disease; diagnostic value; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; BLOOD-FLOW; HEALTHY HUMANS; RESERVE; QUANTIFICATION; MRI; DECONVOLUTION; ANGIOGRAPHY; HEART; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22231
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the incremental diagnostic value of dual-bolus over single-contrast-bolus first pass magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (MR-MPI) for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and Methods: Patients (n = 49) with suspected CAD underwent first pass adenosine stress and rest MR-MPI and invasive coronary angiography (CA). Gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) was injected with a prebolus (1 mL) and a large bolus (0.1 mmol/kg). For the single-bolus technique, the arterial input function (AIF) was obtained from the large-contrast bolus. For the dual-bolus technique, the AIF was reconstructed from the prebolus. Absolute myocardial perfusion was calculated by Fermi-model constrained deconvolution. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to investigate diagnostic accuracy of MR myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of significant CAD on CA at vessel-based analysis. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the minimal stress perfusion value for the detection of significant CAD using the single-bolus and dual-bolus technique was 0.85 +/- 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.93) and 0.77 +/- 0.05 (95% CI, 0.67-0.86), respectively. Conclusion: In this study the dual-bolus technique had no incremental diagnostic value over single-bolus technique for detection of significant CAD with the used contrast concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Absolute Stress Perfusion and Perfusion Reserve for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease
    Joutsiniemi, Esa
    Saraste, Antti
    Kajander, Sami
    Ukkonen, Heikki
    Pietila, Mikko
    Maki, Maija
    Airaksinen, Juhani
    Knuuti, Juhani
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [22] Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance -: A comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography
    Schwitter, J
    Nanz, D
    Kneifel, S
    Bertschinger, K
    Büchi, M
    Knüsel, P
    Marincek, B
    Lüscher, T
    von Schulthess, GK
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (18) : 2230 - 2235
  • [23] Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
    Christoph Klein
    Rolf Gebker
    Thomas Kokocinski
    Stephan Dreysse
    Bernhard Schnackenburg
    Eckart Fleck
    Eike Nagel
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 10
  • [24] Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease
    Klein, Christoph
    Gebker, Rolf
    Kokocinski, Thomas
    Dreysse, Stephan
    Schnackenburg, Bernhard
    Fleck, Eckart
    Nagel, Eike
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2008, 10 (1)
  • [25] Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and contrast echocardiography for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion analysis
    Al-Saadi, N
    Hagendorff, A
    Abdel-Aty, H
    Pilz, B
    Friedrich, MM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 417A - 417A
  • [26] Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Stress-Rest Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
    Bauml, Michael A.
    Farzaneh-Far, Afshin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (04) : 353 - 354
  • [27] The utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3 Tesla for detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5 Tesla
    Cheng, A. S. H.
    Pegg, T. J.
    Karamitsos, T. D.
    Robson, M. D.
    Searle, N.
    Jerosch-Herold, M.
    Choudhury, R. P.
    Banning, A. P.
    Neubauer, S.
    Selvanayagam, J. B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 275 - 275
  • [28] Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance vs SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
    Shah, Dipan J.
    Han, Yuchi
    Bandettini, W. Patricia
    Abraham, Arun
    Woodard, Pamela K.
    Selvanayagam, Joseph B.
    Hamilton-Craig, Christian
    Tan, Ru-San
    Carr, James
    Teo, Lynette
    Kramer, Christopher M.
    Wintersperger, Bernd J.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Flamm, Scott D.
    Friedrich, Matthias G.
    Klem, Igor
    Raman, Subha, V
    Haverstock, Daniel
    Liu, Zheyu
    Brueggenwerth, Guenther
    Santiuste, Marta
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (19) : 1828 - 1838
  • [29] Myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease
    Kostkiewicz, Magdalena
    COR ET VASA, 2015, 57 (06) : E446 - E452
  • [30] Comparison of Myocardial Transmural Perfusion Gradient by Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
    Pan, Jingwei
    Huang, Siyi
    Lu, Zhigang
    Li, Jingbo
    Wan, Qing
    Zhang, Jiayin
    Gao, Chengjie
    Yang, Xin
    Wei, Meng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (10): : 1333 - 1340