High-stakes testing and the default philosophy of education

被引:18
|
作者
Gunzenhauser, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/tip.2003.0007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this article, the author argues that high-stakes testing may lead to a default philosophy of education that holds in high regard a narrow bundle of knowledge and skills. A default philosophy is defined as the vision of education that results from a lack of reflective, engaged dialogue among educators and school communities about their goals and practices. In the context of high-stakes testing, one predominant default philosophy results from an inordinate focus on the tests themselves. As has been shown in research studies throughout the United States, this creates a context in which conversations about the meaning and value of education cannot take place without performance on standardized tests taking center stage. Within this context, dialogue is more difficult, and other possible philosophies of education become harder to articulate and implement. When the default philosophy of education dominates in a school, school district, or state, the possibilities for improving education reform and innovation are limited.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agora: The impact of high-stakes testing
    Middleton, R
    Thomas, A
    Ruiz, R
    McGuire, K
    Bellamy, GT
    Ohanian, S
    Bornfield, G
    O'Connell, PJ
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 51 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [22] The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing
    Basl, Josef
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 42 (05): : 1090 - 1093
  • [23] The Unintended Outcomes of High-Stakes Testing
    Jones, Brett
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 23 (02) : 65 - 86
  • [24] Validity and accountability in high-stakes testing
    Smith, ML
    Foy, P
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 51 (05) : 334 - 344
  • [25] Using Yoga in High-Stakes Testing
    Trump, Kelley Rae
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2021, 46 (02) : 125 - 125
  • [26] Differentiation and high-stakes testing: An oxymoron?
    Brimijoin, K
    THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2005, 44 (03) : 254 - +
  • [27] The sting of high-stakes testing and accountability
    Pipho, C
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2000, 81 (09) : 645 - 646
  • [28] High-stakes testing: Literacy by the numbers
    Johnson, DD
    Johnson, B
    From Orthography to Pedagogy: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF RICHARD L VENEZKY, 2005, : 245 - 263
  • [29] Issues in high-stakes testing programs
    Sloane, FC
    Kelly, AE
    THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2003, 42 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [30] (Over and) Beyond High-Stakes Testing
    Duckworth, Angela L.
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2009, 64 (04) : 279 - 280