Combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: feasibility and safety of a two-team approach

被引:4
|
作者
Tominaga, Tetsuro [1 ]
Nonaka, Takashi [1 ]
Fukuda, Akiko [2 ]
Shiraisi, Toshio [2 ]
Hashimoto, Shintaro [2 ]
Araki, Masato [2 ]
Sumida, Yorihisa [2 ]
Sawai, Terumitsu [1 ]
Nagayasu, Takeshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Dept Surg Oncol, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 8528501, Japan
[2] Sasebo City Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Nagasaki, Japan
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Pelvic exenteration; Transabdominal; Transperineal; Two-team approach; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RECTAL-CANCER; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES; RECURRENT; SURVIVAL; TATME;
D O I
10.4174/astr.2021.101.2.102
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a highly invasive procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Promising options to reduce this invasiveness have included laparoscopic and transperineal approaches. The aim of this study was to identify the safety of combined transabdominal and transperineal endoscopic PE for colorectal malignancies. Methods: Fourteen patients who underwent combined transabdominal and transperineal PE (T group: 2-team approach, n = 7; O group: 1-team approach, n = 7) for colorectal malignancies between April 2016 and March 2020 in our institutions were included in this study. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: All patients successfully underwent R0 resection. Operation time tended to be shorter in the T group (463 minutes) than in the O group (636 minutes, P = 0.080). Time to specimen removal was significantly shorter (258 minutes vs. 423 minutes, P = 0.006), blood loss was lower (343 mL vs. 867 mL, P = 0.042), and volume of blood transfusion was less (0 mL vs. 560 mL, P = 0.063) in the T group, respectively. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Conclusion: Combined transabdominal and transperineal PE under a synchronous 2-team approach was feasible and safe, with the potential to reduce operation time, blood loss, and surgeon stress. [Ann Surg Treat Res 2021;101(2):102-110]
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Combined laparoscopic and transperineal total pelvic exenteration with en bloc resection of urethra for recurrent rectal cancer following robotic abdominoperineal resection - A video vignette
    Kawada, Kenji
    Itatani, Yoshiro
    Masui, Kimihiko
    Tsuge, Itaru
    Kawamoto, Kazuyuki
    Obama, Kazutaka
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (11) : 2270 - 2271
  • [22] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MINIMAL INVASIVE APPROACH AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN SURGERY FOR PELVIC EXENTERATION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER.
    Kumar, N. A.
    Sasi, S. P.
    Desouza, A. L.
    Saklani, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E232 - E232
  • [23] Transperineal minimally invasive surgery-first approach in robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration for advanced low rectal cancer-A video vignette
    Kondo, Akihiro
    Feng, Dongping
    Taketani, Hiroshi
    Oshima, Minoru
    Kobara, Hideki
    Okano, Keiichi
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 26 (11) : 2019 - 2020
  • [24] Laparoscopic Colectomy Combined with Minilaparotomy Approach for Safety Operation in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Yamada, K.
    Onoda, K.
    Kyoi, R.
    Ohshima, R.
    Narahashi, K.
    Kawashima, H.
    Noda, S.
    Okamoto, N.
    Kaneko, H.
    Ohtubo, T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XXII BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY COLON AND RECTAL SURGEONS - ISUCRS, 2008, : 109 - +
  • [25] Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer
    Sato, Kazuma
    Fujita, Takeo
    Otomo, Mayuko
    Shigeno, Takashi
    Kajiyama, Daisuke
    Fujiwara, Naoto
    Daiko, Hiroyuki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 4887 - 4893
  • [26] Obesity and narrow pelvis prolong the operative time in conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, but not in a two-team transanal total mesorectal excision approach
    Hasegawa, Hiroshi
    Matsuda, Takeru
    Yamashita, Kimihiro
    Sawada, Ryuichiro
    Harada, Hitoshi
    Urakawa, Naoki
    Goto, Hironobu
    Kanaji, Shingo
    Oshikiri, Taro
    Kakeji, Yoshihiro
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2023, 16 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [27] Combined transanal total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic low anterior resection: a two-team approach for en bloc resection of locally advanced rectal cancer from small intestine and ovary - A Video Vignette
    Ishiyama, Yasuhiro
    Minagawa, Yume
    Amiki, Manabu
    Ito, Shigo
    Narita, Kazuhiro
    Hirano, Yasumitu
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (07) : 1545 - 1546
  • [28] Two-Team Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision and En Bloc Resection of the Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes, Main Iliac Vessels, and Pelvic Plexus for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis
    Shioi, Ikuma
    Ogawa, Hiroomi
    Hosoi, Nobuhiro
    Yamaguchi, Arisa
    Watanabe, Takayoshi
    Nakazawa, Nobuhiro
    Shibasaki, Yuta
    Shiraishi, Takuya
    Osone, Katsuya
    Okada, Takuhisa
    Sano, Akihiko
    Sakai, Makoto
    Sohda, Makoto
    Shirabe, Ken
    Saeki, Hiroshi
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (02): : 237 - 241
  • [29] Feasibility, safety and efficacy of two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a LiverMetSurvey analysis
    Regimbeau, Jean Marc
    Cosse, Cyril
    Kaiser, Gernot
    Hubert, Catherine
    Laurent, Christophe
    Lapointe, Real
    Isoniemi, Helen
    Adam, Rene
    HPB, 2017, 19 (05) : 396 - 405
  • [30] Feasibility of needlescopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safety and learning curve for Japanese Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-unqualified young surgeons
    Miki, Hisanori
    Fukunaga, Yosuke
    Nagasaki, Toshiya
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Fujimoto, Yoshiya
    Nagayama, Satoshi
    Ueno, Masashi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 752 - 757