Should tamoxifen be used in breast cancer prevention?

被引:11
|
作者
Kramer, R [2 ]
Brown, P
机构
[1] Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Breast Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-200427130-00001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. The risk of developing breast cancer can be lowered by maintaining a healthy bodyweight and avoiding long-term use of combined estrogen and progestogen replacement after menopause. However, many women are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer secondary to age, early menarche, a family history of breast cancer or a personal history of benign breast disease. These women may now be offered tamoxifen as a chemoprevention therapy. Five years of tamoxifen treatment results in a reduction in the relative risk of developing estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer of 48%. This benefit outweighs the risk of tamoxifen-related adverse events for many healthy women. However, the benefit-risk ratio of tamoxifen chemoprevention varies for individual women. The randomized clinical trials evaluating standard-dose tamoxifen versus placebo as chemoprevention therapy are reviewed and analyzed to determine which particular women are most likely to benefit and least likely to experience a tamoxifen-related adverse event. Tamoxifen decreases the risk of breast cancer associated with aging, having a first-degree relative with disease, and a personal diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. Women who have had a hysterectomy and are at low risk of a thromboembolic event have a decreased risk of adverse effects associated with tamoxifen therapy. The strengths and weaknesses of the Gail model (frequently used to assess an individual's risk of developing invasive breast cancer over the next 5 years) are highlighted. A method for assessing the benefit-risk ratio for an individual woman is presented. Alternative breast cancer chemoprevention strategies are considered, including the use of aromatase inhibitors. This article discusses the pros and cons of these various preventive therapies and concludes that at this time, tamoxifen remains the gold standard for breast cancer prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 989
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Use of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene for the Prevention of Breast Cancer
    Wickerham, D. Lawrence
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Vogel, Victor G.
    Cronin, Walter M.
    Cecchini, Reena S.
    Ford, Leslie G.
    Wolmark, Norman
    CANCER PREVENTION II, 2009, 181 : 113 - 119
  • [32] Tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: safety warning
    Wooltorton, E
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 167 (04) : 378 - 379
  • [33] The benefits and costs of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention
    Eckermann, SD
    Martin, AJ
    Stockler, MR
    Simes, RJ
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 27 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [34] Tamoxifen prevention of breast cancer: an instance of the fingerpost
    Rockhill, B
    Colditz, G
    Kaye, J
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (08) : 657 - 658
  • [35] A proposed mechanism of tamoxifen in breast cancer prevention
    Yu, FL
    Bender, W
    CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2002, 26 (05): : 370 - 375
  • [36] The cost effectiveness of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer
    Noe, LL
    Becker, RV
    Gradishar, WJ
    Gore, M
    Trotter, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 1999, 5 (06): : S389 - S406
  • [37] Tamoxifen for breast-cancer prevention - Reply
    Cuzick, J
    Forbes, J
    Howell, A
    LANCET, 2003, 361 (9352): : 178 - 178
  • [38] Primary prevention of breast cancer: Whither tamoxifen?
    Rouse, DJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (03): : 431 - 432
  • [39] Tamoxifen, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Prevention
    Boyd, Norman F.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (09): : 704 - 705
  • [40] Tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial - An update
    Ford, LG
    Johnson, KA
    ETIOLOGY OF BREAST AND GYNECOLOGICAL CANCERS, 1997, 396 : 271 - 282