Intrauterine growth restriction and circulating neurotrophin levels at term

被引:33
|
作者
Malamitsi-Puchner, Ariadne [1 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantinos E. [1 ]
Economou, Emmanuel [1 ]
Boutsikou, Maria [1 ]
Boutsikou, Theodora [1 ]
Kyriakakou, Marialena [1 ]
Puchner, Karl-Philipp [1 ]
Hassiakos, Demetrios [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 2, Div Neonatol, GR-10682 Athens, Greece
关键词
neurotrophins; intrauterine growth restriction; perinatal period; fullterm neonates; brain sparing effect;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.09.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) fetuses are those with estimated weight < 10th customized centile, displaying signs of chronic malnutrition and hypoxia leading to brain sparing effect. Neurotrophins, [Nerve Growth Factor (NGF), Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), Neurotrophin-4 (NT-4)] are important for pre- and post-natal brain development. Aims: To investigate circulating NGF, BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4 levels in IUGR and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fullterm fetuses and neonates (day- 1 [N1] and day-4 [N4]) and in their mothers. Study design: Prospective case control study. Subjects: 60 mothers and their single 30 IUGR and 30 AGA fullterm fetuses and neonates. Outcome measures: Determination, by enzyme immunoassays, of NGF, BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4 plasma levels. Results: No statistically significant differences existed between IUGR and AGA maternal, fetal and neonatal levels of BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4. NGF was significantly higher in AGA than IUGR maternal (p=0.007), fetal (p=0.01), neonatal day 1 (p=0.043) and 4 (p=0.003) plasma, and positively correlated with the infants' centiles and birthweights. IUGR and AGA maternal neurotrophins were higher than the respective fetal and neonatal ones and no correlation with gender or delivery mode in both groups was observed. Conclusions: In the perinatal period, circulating levels of BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4 do not differ in IUGR and AGA pregnancies, in contrast to NGF levels, which are higher in the AGA group. NGF is the only neurotrophin correlating with customized centiles and birthweights of the infants. Neurotrophin concentrations are higher in maternal plasma and do not depend on gender. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 469
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Resnik, R
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (03): : 490 - 496
  • [22] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Haram, K
    Softeland, E
    Bukowski, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 93 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [23] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Tan, TYT
    Yeo, GSH
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [24] Intrauterine growth restriction
    Donoso Bernales, Bernardita
    Oyarzun Ebensperger, Enrique
    MEDWAVE, 2012, 12 (06):
  • [25] INTRAUTERINE THERAPY OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION
    Gulcin Gumus, Hatice
    Illa, Miriam
    Pla, Laura
    Crispi, Fatima
    Gratacos, Eduard
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2016, 30
  • [26] Long-Term Metabolic Consequences of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Kyoung Eun Joung
    Jieun Lee
    Jae Hyun Kim
    Current Pediatrics Reports, 2020, 8 : 45 - 55
  • [27] Influence of intrauterine growth restriction on serum ionized magnesium levels in term neonates in the first week of life
    Barbosa, NOE
    Okay, TS
    Leone, CR
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 477A - 477A
  • [28] Is it necessary to induce labor in cases of intrauterine growth restriction at term?
    Shavit, Tal
    Ashual, Eran
    Regev, Rivka
    Sadeh, Dana
    Fejgin, Moshe D.
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (05) : 539 - 543
  • [29] Long-Term Metabolic Consequences of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Joung, Kyoung Eun
    Lee, Jieun
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    CURRENT PEDIATRICS REPORTS, 2020, 8 (02) : 45 - 55
  • [30] Impact of intrauterine growth restriction on long-term health
    Salam, Rehana A.
    Das, Jai K.
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2014, 17 (03): : 249 - 254